Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.0-4
of my package renaissance.
It builds these binary packages:
librenaissance0 - GNUstep GUI Framework - library files
librenaissance0-dev - GNUstep GUI Framework - development files
renaissance-doc - GNUstep GUI Framework -
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:38:15PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
This part was my doing, sorry. It should be possible to build these
on mipsel [...], but that makes it difficult for people without access
to a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0-1
of my package pidgin-microblog.
It builds these binary packages:
pidgin-microblog - Microblogging plugins for Pidgin
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
Is there any reason qemu-mipsel isn't good enough?
There was a concern (flamewar) a few years ago that doing that would
result in broken binaries. I don't know how true that would be today
or if it is now consider
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 07:59:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl wrote:
Is there any reason qemu-mipsel isn't good enough?
There was a concern (flamewar) a few years ago that doing that would
result in broken binaries. I don't
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:20:22 +0400 Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:05:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I can't say anything definitive, but I can speculate that it will
not be a problem, and here is the logic:
xpdf's rendering code is itself essentially an older
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package autojump.
* Package name: autojump
Version : 8-1
Upstream Author : Joel Schaerer joel.schae...@laposte.net
* URL : http://wiki.github.com/joelthelion/autojump/
* License : GPL3
Section : shells
Le samedi 05 juin 2010, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
If you can pinpoint some example files that crash evince but work fine
in xpdf, I will test them. So far, I have not encountered any issues
myself. Gentoo has been shipping xpdf-poppler for a few years now, and I
haven't seen any complaints of
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 12:24:15PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:20:22 +0400 Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On the other hand, xpdf opens all
files without any problems, but can be a bit slower in scrolling
sometimes. The last is not a problem. I am simply afraid that with
Hi again, Charles.
On Jun 04 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:47:27PM -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
Just as a quick question, if you use xpdf with the poppler backend,
do you have poppler-data installed? It contains the character
mappings established by adobe for
Hi, Jakub.
On Jun 04 2010, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br, 2010-06-03, 16:00:
Thank you very much for your warm reception. :-)
Don't get me wrong: I believe that all PDF readers in Debian suck
and I appreciate that you want to change that state.
Ah, now your opinion is
On Jun 05 2010, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
I never saw any file that made Evince crash, but I saw some files that
Xpdf renders perfectly and where Evince does not display at all some
fonts. For instance the LaTeX fontspec package's documentation, that
you can find at
On Do, 03 Jun 2010, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi, there.
On Jun 03 2010, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
This change is for sure quite significant. BTW, do you know if the
internal code in xpdf is equivalent feature wise to poppler? I know
that poppler was a spin-off of the rendering code of xpdf.
13 matches
Mail list logo
