Re: RFS: rush

2010-06-13 Thread George Danchev
Tim Retout writes: On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se wrote: I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package. I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the project) shall have to discuss the sponsoring situation. I will not be

Re: RFS: emu8051

2010-06-13 Thread Bhavani Shankar R
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com wrote: I am not a devian developer, so I can not sponser your upload, however here are some comments: debian/control: XSBC-original

Re: RFS: presage

2010-06-13 Thread Matteo Vescovi
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Matteo Vescovi matteo.vesc...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I am looking for a sponsor/reviewer for my package presage. Here is a review: Many thanks for reviewing my package. I started off fixing the reported issues with debian (quilt)

Re: RFS: pgfouine (updated package)

2010-06-13 Thread Tim Retout
On 31 May 2010 22:35, Luis Uribe a...@eviled.org wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1 of my package pgfouine. I'd be interested in sponsoring this, or you might also be interested in the pkg-postgres team. Please write your changelog entries in the same

Re: A lot of pending packages

2010-06-13 Thread nikrou77
Hi all, I don't agree with you on the reasons. The thing is, PHP applications in Debian aren't made to support multiple instance. The result being that it doesn't make sense to use them, because you wont be able to have more than a single site with it. If there was a move toward multiple

Re: RFS: rush

2010-06-13 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* George Danchev danc...@spnet.net [100613 09:33]: * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or adopt, especially with large and complex pieces. That would avoid wasting their time. I

sponsorship, asking before packaging (was: Re: RFS: rush)

2010-06-13 Thread Tim Retout
On 13 June 2010 12:47, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote: * George Danchev danc...@spnet.net [100613 09:33]: * the easy part: there is nothing wrong for non-DD to ask in advance if there are interested sponsor(s) of the piece of software they intend to package or adopt, especially with

Re: RFS: presage

2010-06-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Matteo Vescovi matteo.vesc...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Matteo Vescovi matteo.vesc...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: ... Right, I modified presage build system to use the system libtinyxml rather than the embedded copy. It would

Re: RFS: webfs (updated package)

2010-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21+ds1-5 of my package webfs. Uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)

2010-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! I've just uploaded ziproxy! Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wru3auyg@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net

RFC: Using git/collab-maint/PET for debian-mentors.

2010-06-13 Thread Tim Retout
[Please excuse the long email. I welcome comments.] There has been some recent discussion on debian-mentors about the difficulties being faced by contributors seeking sponsorship, i.e. that DDs willing to sponsor packages are short on time and/or motivation. In my view, this is an important

Re: RFC: Using git/collab-maint/PET for debian-mentors.

2010-06-13 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org: [Please excuse the long email. I welcome comments.] Hi, a lot of helpful technical details, already used for years [1] (though I don't know what PET is), however I still can't see how the 'splitted brain syndrome' is dealt with, the logical problem,

Re: RFC: Using git/collab-maint/PET for debian-mentors.

2010-06-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org wrote:      * Maintaining packages in git in collab-maint. (I don't think we        want a separate pkg-mentors repository, because once people        graduate from mentors they would feel compelled to move away.) As said on IRC,

RFS: mcron

2010-06-13 Thread Dale Mellor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcron. * Package name: mcron Version : 1.0.5-1 Upstream Author : Dale Mellor dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/mcron * License

Re: RFS: mcron

2010-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Dale Mellor dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net writes: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mcron - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget

question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Elías Alejandro
Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: Newest version on remote site is 0.5.1, local version is 0.6 =

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
On Domingo 13 Junio 2010 20:53:23 Christoph Egger escribió: Hi! Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me:

git-buildpackage and multiple source tarballs

2010-06-13 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, I have a small package which is currently in the process to being converted to 3.0 (quilt) with multiple original tarballs, thanks to upstream's decision to ship the single 31 KB manpage in its own tarball. I maintain the Debian packaging in git and used to use git-buildpackage. Do I see

Re: RFS: emu8051

2010-06-13 Thread Praveen A
2010/6/13 Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com: I would be glad if someone from pkg-electronics or mentors reviews the package and uploads the package for me you have to send a mail to pkg-electronics-devel list if you want some one in that team to review and upload your package

RFS: bubblemon

2010-06-13 Thread Adam Sjøgren
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package of bubblemon. * Package name: bubblemon Version : 2.0.15-1 Upstream Author : Johan Walles johan.wal...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/bubblemon/ * License : GPL 2.0 Section :

RFS: amavisd-milter

2010-06-13 Thread Harald Jenny
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package amavisd-milter. * Package name: amavisd-milter Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Petr Rehor r...@rx.cz * URL : http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Section : mail It builds

Re: RFC: Using git/collab-maint/PET for debian-mentors.

2010-06-13 Thread Ben Finney
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: As said on IRC, cue anti-git flamage. In debian we use a multitude of version control systems and we shouldn't impose choice of a specific VCS nor force people to use a VCS. I personally maintain packages in git, in SVN and in no VCS and prefer either no VCS

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Ben Finney
Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: as you see, my debian/watch is: version=3 http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz Unrelated to the problem you're reporting, but a minor point: Your regex could be tighter (it's best to be as specific as feasible in a regex). I suggest: