Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package obdgpslogger. I emailed this
list about this package a couple months ago. The advice given to me in
#debian-mentors was to ping this mailing list again, as my message may
have fallen through the cracks.
This request corresponds to my ITP
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eot-utils.
* Package name: eot-utils
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Bert Bos b...@w3.org
* URL : http://www.w3.org/Tools/eot-utils/
* License : W3C® SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE
Section : web
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools.
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : utils
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:20 +0200, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools.
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
*
Hello,
I'm still working on the collada-dom package, and I noticed that
the source tarball contains 3d assets that are licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike license
(no version).
I believe this license is not DFSG-compatible. These files are
part of the software
2010/7/18 Sébastien Barthélemy barthel...@crans.org:
Should I repackage a dfsg version of the source without these
files? (I think so, but would welcome a confirmation).
Yes, or find some DFSG-free resources to send upstream. One place to
look is here:
Am 18.07.2010 13:46, schrieb gregor herrmann:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:20 +0200, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools.
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL
Am 18.07.2010 15:04, schrieb Paul Wise:
The bug report mentions security issues, I assume those are associated
with the embedded code copy of xpdf mentioned in the bug report.
poppler is a shared library fork of xpdf. Moving to a shared library
instead of an embedded code copy means that the
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Dr. Tilo Levante t...@levante.de wrote:
it only mentions xpdf bugs, so I try to remove the embedded xpdf code and
upload the result.
Great.
Please also take a look at the closed and archived bugs and unarchive
and reopen any that still apply:
* Sebastian Ramacher s.ramac...@gmx.at, 2010-07-17, 22:29:
Should I open a new ITP?
No. Please contact André personally, ideally using the
582...@bugs.debian.org address. If he doesn't respond for, say, 2
weeks, change owner of the bug to yourself and then proceed with
requesting
2010/7/14 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
The thing is that I'm not a legalese person, so I'm not confident enough
to upload it. Would you mind passing the license through debian-legal
and see what they say?
Okay, I raised this on debian-legal and indeed they confirmed that it
is non-free
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:13:33PM +0200, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
Am 18.07.2010 15:04, schrieb Paul Wise:
The bug report mentions security issues, I assume those are associated
with the embedded code copy of xpdf mentioned in the bug report.
poppler is a shared library fork of xpdf. Moving to
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100716-1
of my package mobile-broadband-provider-info.
You should not close bugs using the changelog mechanism unless the bug
was fixed in the version being uploaded.
13 matches
Mail list logo
