-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package greasefire.
* Package name: greasefire
Version : 1.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Steve Krulewitz skr...@gmail.com
* URL :
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
=
Case 1: only one package rule
...
Thanks.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:48:16PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org [100726 17:27]:
=
Case 2: package transition rule
All the contents of the package foo is incorporated by bar in
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 02:36 +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:11:47 +0300, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Why did you drop this line from debian/rules?
rm -f config.sub config.guess
I'm not sure why they are there to begin with.
These files are in orig tarball
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:47:48PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 05:52 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
Not answering the Conflics/Breaks issue, but some remark about Provides.
* Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org [100726 17:27]:
=
Case 2: package transition rule
All the contents of
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich eug...@raptor.kiev.ua wrote:
As you started reviewing this package does it mean that
I have found a sponsor and now should note appropriately in m.d.n?
No. Since I'm at DebConf I have some time to review packages, but not
nessecarily enough
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:47:48PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 05:52 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:03:42AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:53
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org writes:
Hi folks,
Breaks field was added to policy in 3.8 and current stable dpkg supports
it as I understand. So we are ready to use it, as I understand.
Under this new situation, I would like to confirm what is the best
practice for each case scenario.
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David Banks amoe...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sisc.
I have some questions / notes:
- Is there a reason for not putting the jar files into /usr/share/java
to comply to the Debian java policy?
- May you split the changes
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:36:46 +0300, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Eugene Paskevich
eug...@raptor.kiev.ua wrote:
As you started reviewing this package does it mean that
I have found a sponsor and now should note appropriately in m.d.n?
No. Since I'm at
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:21:26 +0300, Eugene Paskevich
eug...@raptor.kiev.ua wrote:
Might be a good idea to make upstream more flexible and only hide
stuff if a certain environment variable is set. In any case your patch
makes the system print ugly stuff like this:
ESC[KESC[0;33mGenerating
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:10PM -0600, Lloyd Standish wrote:
I looked at zenity. From the man page which describes the command line
options, I don't think it is capable of a complex dialog with different types
of input fields and action buttons, all available in the same multi-tabbed
On 2010-07-15 19:17, Michael Diers wrote:
On 2010-07-15 07:58, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24:01PM +0200, Michael Diers wrote:
Dear mentors and backporters,
here's another attempt at soliciting sponsorship for my update to the
Subversion package in lenny-backports.
As it
14 matches
Mail list logo
