Re: Help with uswsusp

2010-09-08 Thread Michael Biebl
On 07.09.2010 21:15, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On 07/09/10 01:40, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Hi! Now I am trying to maintain the database (from 8 months ago), and the project was moved from sourceforge to git.kernel.org, but there is not a new version in the webpage. The database is important

Re: Help with uswsusp

2010-09-08 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Rodolfo kix Garcia k...@kix.es wrote: The suspend-utils (common name) is created and maintained by Rafael and Pavel. They are working now in the kernel, in the power management. The software is in a very stable versiĆ³n, but the problem is the database. A new

Re: Help with uswsusp

2010-09-08 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:11:16 +0200, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: On 07.09.2010 21:15, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On 07/09/10 01:40, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Hi! Now I am trying to maintain the database (from 8 months ago), and the project was moved from sourceforge to git.kernel.org, but

Re: Include 0AD, a new fancy 3D RTS

2010-09-08 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote: DXT compression is based on Simon Brown's squish library. The library also contains an alternative GPU-accelerated compressor that uses CUDA and is one order of magnitude faster. This might make it not suitable for

Re: Include 0AD, a new fancy 3D RTS

2010-09-08 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@gmail.com wrote: DXT compression is based on Simon Brown's squish library. The library also contains an alternative GPU-accelerated compressor that uses CUDA and is

RFS: gnustep-back (RC bugfix)

2010-09-08 Thread Yavor Doganov
ear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.18.0-3 of my package gnustep-back. It builds these binary packages: gnustep-back-common - The GNUstep GUI Backend - common files gnustep-back-dbg - The GNUstep GUI Backend - debugging symbols gnustep-back0.18 - The GNUstep GUI Backend

Re: RFS: lowpan-tools

2010-09-08 Thread Luca Bruno
Luis R. Rodriguez scrisse: I am looking for a sponsor for my package lowpan-tools. Isn't this pretty useless without the kernel bits, and what's the status of the kernel bits? Wasn't there some silly license issues with it? Why is it not upstream? It is my understanding that some parts of

Re: RFS: lowpan-tools

2010-09-08 Thread Luca Bruno
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov scrisse: I am looking for a sponsor for my package lowpan-tools. Sorry for taking so much time. I found some minor issues, which shouldn't be so hard to work our as you are also upstream author. First of all, I'm also interested in this package, but I can't maintain it

popcon question

2010-09-08 Thread Harald Jenny
Hello list, sorry if this question was already answered somewhere but I was searching for popcon data for a binary package available in stable which got removed in testing - is it possible to get such data and if yes who may I talk to? Kind regards Harald Jenny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

package maintainer question

2010-09-08 Thread Harald Jenny
Hello everbody, I'm facing the problem that a package I maintain depends on a library whose maintainer is either to busy or not interested providing a deb for the new upstream version which would (hopefully) fix a serious bug in the library. The package in question is sendmail, the debian

Re: Help with uswsusp

2010-09-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, September 08, 2010, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:11:16 +0200, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: On 07.09.2010 21:15, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On 07/09/10 01:40, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: Hi! Now I am trying to maintain the database (from 8 months ago), and

Re: package maintainer question

2010-09-08 Thread Richard Laager
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 02:50 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: I'm facing the problem that a package I maintain depends on a library whose maintainer is either to busy or not interested providing a deb for the new upstream version which would (hopefully) fix a serious bug in the library. IANADD,

Re: package maintainer question

2010-09-08 Thread Harald Jenny
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:32:39PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 02:50 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: I'm facing the problem that a package I maintain depends on a library whose maintainer is either to busy or not interested providing a deb for the new upstream version