RFS: mupen64plus-*-* (updated package)

2010-12-23 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version of mupen64plus. This version was splitted in different source package because the source bundle archive isn't dfsg compliant and doesn't contain all plugins. This upload is for experimental because I got different request on the mupen64

RFS: tintii (updated package)

2010-12-23 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.3-3 of my package "tintii". It builds these binary packages: tintii - Turns colour photos into b/w and highlights regions in colour The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 607324 The package

Re: Simple question on RFP entries

2010-12-23 Thread Etienne Millon
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:30:51PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > > See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for more details. > > Thanks. Should I also become the owner of the bug? Yes. -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Simple question on RFP entries

2010-12-23 Thread Bartosz Feński
Dnia 2010-12-23, o godz. 17:15:43 Yuri D'Elia napisał(a): > I'd like to work on an existing package request. It's bug #603078: > makepp, a make replacement that I already use since years. > > What's the policy on RFP entries in that case? Should I also file an ITP > to notify others that someone

Re: Simple question on RFP entries

2010-12-23 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:24:44 +0100 Etienne Millon wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:15:43PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > > What's the policy on RFP entries in that case? Should I also file an > > ITP to notify others that someone is already working on it? Or > > should I simply close the RFP bug

Re: Simple question on RFP entries

2010-12-23 Thread Etienne Millon
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:15:43PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > What's the policy on RFP entries in that case? Should I also file an > ITP to notify others that someone is already working on it? Or > should I simply close the RFP bug in the first entry in the > changelog? Hello, If you're working

Simple question on RFP entries

2010-12-23 Thread Yuri D'Elia
I'd like to work on an existing package request. It's bug #603078: makepp, a make replacement that I already use since years. What's the policy on RFP entries in that case? Should I also file an ITP to notify others that someone is already working on it? Or should I simply close the RFP bug in

Re: RFS: mosquitto (updated version)

2010-12-23 Thread Roger Light
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package mosquitto, detailed below. It'd be great if someone would give me an early Christmas present by uploading it. There are a few warnings generated when building the package: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided if