Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Wise
Hi Vincent, (CCing you since I'm not sure which lists you are on if any, sorry for any duplicate mail) Looks like you are taking over the ITPs owned by Bertrand Marc, with his permission. Bertrand was maintaining the packaging in the games team's SVN repository, but you don't seem to have

Re: RFS: blockade upgrade

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Wise
I would suggest joining the Debian games team, committing the package to our SVN repository and maintaining it there. If you are willing to join the team, please check out our wiki pages, jump on our IRC channel, introduce yourself and we will give you a run-down of how the team works:

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: Hi Vincent, (CCing you since I'm not sure which lists you are on if any, sorry for any duplicate mail) Looks like you are taking over the ITPs owned by Bertrand Marc, with his permission. Bertrand was maintaining the

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700 Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, Not sure if all the CCs are required, so preserving them. I am looking for a sponsor for my package 0ad. * Package name

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Karl Goetz
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700 Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi vincent, I've left all the CCs in; should they all be maintained, or can some be dropped? Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 0ad. Description : 3D real-time strategy (RTS) game of

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Philip Taylor
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: Not sure if all the CCs are required, so preserving them. [...] Is there code distributed under the terms of license_dbghelp.txt in this package?

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Philip Taylor
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Karl Goetz k...@kgoetz.id.au wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700 I've left all the CCs in; should they all be maintained, or can some be dropped? [...] ./binaries/data/tests/collada/sphere.pmd  - its a data file, and i can't see a free software tool to

Re: docs are generated on all build machines

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Wild
On 04/02/2011 04:12 PM, The Fungi wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:02:19AM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: I think his package is already Arch:all. [...] Ahh, yes, I had missed the package name/source. I agree your analysis sounds a far more likely scenario given the problem description.

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 0ad. * Package name: 0ad [..] My motivation for maintaining this package is: Even though 0 A.D. is still in Alpha, it is still playable (and also very fun if you like

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Scott Howard
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:59:59 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 0ad. * Package name    : 0ad [..] haven't checked the package, but given I'd like to play it, I tried to

subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-03 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear all, I am working on the dcmtk package. I get a bizarre behavior when trying to uninstall it: $ sudo apt-get remove dcmtk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer

Re: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-03 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Dear all, I am working on the dcmtk package. I get a bizarre behavior when trying to uninstall it: [..] Stopping DCMTK Central Test Node: dcmqrscpdpkg: error processing dcmtk (--remove): subprocess installed pre-removal

Re: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-03 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
David, On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:41 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Dear all,   I am working on the dcmtk package. I get a bizarre behavior when trying to uninstall it: [..] Stopping DCMTK Central Test Node:

Re: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-03 Thread David Paleino
Hello Mathieu, On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:03:30 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: if [ -x /etc/init.d/dcmqrscp ]; then if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then invoke-rc.d --quiet dcmqrscp stop else /etc/init.d/dcmqrscp stop fi fi # Automatically added by

Re: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

2011-04-03 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: Hello Mathieu, On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:03:30 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: if [ -x /etc/init.d/dcmqrscp ]; then     if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then         invoke-rc.d --quiet dcmqrscp stop     else        

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Dmitry, Sorry for the huge wait for a first reply to your post. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package polygraph. * Package name: polygraph Version : 4.0.11-1 Upstream Author : The Measurement Factory, Inc. i...@measurement-factory.com * URL

Re: RFS: qmagneto

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] I finally got around to take a look at your package. One basic problem must be solved at first: several files lack license and copyright information: src/changethumbimpl.h src/application.cpp src/changethumbimpl.cpp src/channeliconitem.h src/application.h src/releaseversion.h

Re: RFS: mpd-sima (autoqueue MPD client, find similar artists to queue)

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mpd-sima (new version of previously named sima package). * Package name: mpd-sima Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Kaliko Jack ef...@azylum.org * URL : http://codingteam.net/project/sima *

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
Hi Michael. On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:19:47 +0100, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: Hi Dmitry, Sorry for the huge wait for a first reply to your post. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package polygraph. * Package name: polygraph Version :

Re: RFS: mediadownloader (retry)

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediadownloader. * Package name: mediadownloader Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Marco Bavagnoli lil.dei...@gmail.com * URL : http://mediadownloader.cz.cc * License : gpl3 Section : graphics

Re: RFS: bluecove, bluecove-gpl

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Chris, Sorry for the huge wait. [...] If these files completely lack copyright information, it might not even be legal to distribute them. The proper approach would definitely be to track down where they come from and fix the copyrightlicense information. Maybe they are part

Re: RFS: sic (updated package/adoption)

2011-04-03 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 March 2011 13:39:16 Jeroen Schot wrote: Dear mentors, Hi, sic- simple irc client (sic) The upload would fix this bug: 606083 (ITA) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sic/sic_1.1-4.dsc Looks good. Uploaded. Thanks for taking care of orphaned packages. --

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Dmitry, Thanks a lot for the very quick reply. [...] Thanks for review. Note that the package has been already uploaded by Tollef Fog Heen. Oh, I must have missed that message, sorry. [...] I see how the non-standard preamble can make licensing checking harder (though, I do not

Re: RFS: LeechCraft (second try)

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft. * Package name: leechcraft Version : 0.4.55+88-1 Upstream Author : Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com * URL : http://leechcraft.org * License : GPLv3 Section : net

Re: RFS: blankon (updated package)

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package blankon. It builds these binary packages: gnome-icon-theme-blankon - BlankOn Ombilin icon theme for GTK+ 2.x [...] I'd generally be fine uploading this package, but I fail to understand why this theme

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:19:47 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: * Package name: polygraph Version : 4.0.11-1 Upstream Author : The Measurement Factory, Inc. i...@measurement-factory.com * URL : http://www.web-polygraph.org * License : Apache-2.0 Section

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] FWIW, Apache itself does not follow what you consider a license application requirement. For example, the very web page you linked to above, has no preamble and just says Copyright 2011 The Apache Software Foundation, Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 at the

Re: RFS: polygraph

2011-04-03 Thread Dmitry Kurochkin
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:36:25 +0100, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: Hi, [...] FWIW, Apache itself does not follow what you consider a license application requirement. For example, the very web page you linked to above, has no preamble and just says Copyright 2011 The

Re: RFS: pms (updated package)

2011-04-03 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Benoît, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.42-0.1 of my package pms. It builds these binary packages: pms- Practical Music Search, an MPD client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 551619, 612192, 615003 This version

RFS: xmem: fixes FTBFS

2011-04-03 Thread Michelle Konzack
Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package xmem. This upload fixes Bug #556712 (FTBFS / --no-add-needed) URL: http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmem dget http://devel.debian.tamay-dogan.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmem/xmem_1.20-28+b1.dsc I would be glad if

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com writes: - As for inclusion in Debian: 0AD has some bundled library issues (e.g. fcollada). The fcollada issue has been mentioned on this list [1-2]. Basically fcollada was a library created by a company 10 years ago with a GPL license. Since then the company

What naming scheme should be used for the Swiss Ephemeris?

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Elliott
I am trying to package the Swiss Ephemeris in a way that will allow it to be included in all the various distros. Actually I hope to package all the free software astrology programs for the various distros. They all depend on the Swiss Ephemeris, so it must be first. It is unfortunate that

Re: What naming scheme should be used for the Swiss Ephemeris?

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: 1) How should my source packages be named?  Is swe_unix_src_1.77.00 OK? The source package name should be swe and the version number 1.77.00. 2) How should by library package be named? I am sure it should start

Re: What naming scheme should be used for the Swiss Ephemeris?

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Elliott
On Sunday, April 03, 2011 09:25:18 pm Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: 1) How should my source packages be named? Is swe_unix_src_1.77.00 OK? The source package name should be swe and the version number 1.77.00. If I

Re: What naming scheme should be used for the Swiss Ephemeris?

2011-04-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: If I change the name how will people know the original name of the pristine tarball? Or be able to verify that it has not been changed? If you are using the upstream tarball without repacking it then by looking