Ping ?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:03 AM, roucaries bastien
roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
Reuploaded a new version comments online
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 07:50 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote:
Please
Hi Kilian,
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 16:09 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Fabrizio,
So you are seriously stepping up as new upstream? Including you are
willing to pick up and maintain all development required to fix eventual
security holes that may pop up in the future etc.?
sorry for replying
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:03:24PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
That's what Suggests/Recommends are made for. E.g. Rhythmbox Recommends
rhythmbox-plugins, quodlibet Suggests quodlibet-plugins... From Policy §7.2
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with
this
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-1
of my package qasmixer.
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive QT4 GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Hello Alessandro Ghedini
- you should append something like (plugins) to the short description so
that it does not duplicate the description of the main package.
Done
- the -plugins package right now Depends on various -dev packages. I do not
think they are needed.
Replaced them with
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.0+ds1-6
of my package gforth. It contains two years' worth of
packaging fixes along with an attempt at multiarch conversion
and an acknowledged NMU. I am asking on the list since
Patrick Matthäi, who kindly uploaded a couple of
Andreas Moog am...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 10:03 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Andreas Moogam...@ubuntu.com writes:
On 07/11/2011 08:17 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
I didn't look into your package, but still having an empty
dependency_libs entry is important for multiarch support.
On 07/12/2011 03:49 PM, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
Anyway, I looked into unstable and patched /usr/lib/libxmlsec1*.la
temporarily, which means clearing dependency_libs.
Unfortunately, this doesn't help. Libtool (ld) still links libgeier
against all the (unnecessary) libs as before. dpkg-shlibdeps
On 10/07/11 15:18, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.0.4+repacknot1-1
of my package assaultcube-data.
It builds these binary packages:
assaultcube-data - data files for AssaultCube
assaultcube-server-anticheat - AssaultCube server
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4.4-1~bpo60+1
of my package audacious-plugins.
It builds these binary packages:
audacious-plugins - Base plugins for audacious
audacious-plugins-dbg - Audacious-Plugins debug symbols
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, shuerhaaken wrote:
- the -plugins package right now Depends on various -dev packages. I do not
think they are needed.
Replaced them with binary packages in the debian/control file
Again, you don't need to manually add libraries to Depends given
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:42 +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-1
of my package qasmixer.
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qasmixer/qasmixer_0.12.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:25:40 +0100
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gogglesmm.
* Package name: gogglesmm
Version : 0.12.2-5
Upstream Author : Sander Jansen s.jan...@gmail.com
* URL
Hi,
[...]
Left is the missing man page. The original package does not provide a man
page, so I can not provide one.
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that argument - it's quite frequent that Debian
package maintainers have to provide additional man pages because upstream
doesn't provide one.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Rebuilt with the orig.tar.gz (instead of the orig.tar.bz2 that you had)
as debian/watch pulled that one in for me, signed and uploaded.
Thank you Kilian!
If you see tar.bz2 as the better alternative please bump debian/watch to
reflect
Michael Tautschnig mt at debian.org writes:
Hi,
[...]
Left is the missing man page. The original package does not provide a man
page, so I can not provide one.
I'm sorry, but I don't buy that argument - it's quite frequent that Debian
package maintainers have to provide
Hello All:
I recall that there was a script which permits one to compare package
version names to determine which one is greater. I just can't remember
the name of the script. Any clues?
Carlo
--
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for Graduate Admissions, Graduate
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Carlo Segre wrote:
I recall that there was a script which permits one to compare package
version names to determine which one is greater. I just can't remember the
name of the script. Any clues?
dpkg --compare-versions
--
bye,
pabs
18 matches
Mail list logo
