Re: package with new soname: questions about .symbols and uploading

2011-07-15 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org, 2011-07-14, 20:34: If you can confirm that the symbols file for your last version and this version match up perfectly, then the SONAME shouldn't have been bumped in the first place Err,

Re: RE : : RFS: autoconf-archive (updated package)

2011-07-15 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Bastien, On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:34 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: I have done the work needed On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bastien, On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: Ping ? 1. debian/watch needs fixing to

Re: RE : : RFS: autoconf-archive (updated package)

2011-07-15 Thread roucaries bastien
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bastien, On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:34 +0200, roucaries bastien wrote: I have done the work needed On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: Hi Bastien, On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:17

Re: RE : : RFS: autoconf-archive (updated package)

2011-07-15 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:47:25 +0200, Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed I've not fixed the unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt warning of lintian, but maybe that could be part of the gitpkg fix that would only ship debian/patches (including debian/patches/series) if

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

2011-07-15 Thread Peter Bennett
Regarding the dependency quilt (= 0.48-7~) If I remove it, lintian complains: lintian -I --pedantic *.dsc E: jampal source: missing-build-dependency quilt If I include the quilt dependency, lintian complains lintian -I --pedantic *.dsc P: jampal source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt I am using

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

2011-07-15 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 15.07.2011 16:45, Peter Bennett wrote: Regarding the dependency quilt (= 0.48-7~) .. Your rules file contains: %: dh --with quilt $@ that is, you explicitly invoke dh_quilt. This is not needed for you, using the 3.0 (quilt)

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

2011-07-15 Thread Peter Bennett
Thank you Arno for your assistance. I have uploaded a new version of jampal, 02.01.05-1 All problems previously noted have been fixed. The lintian appears to be clean lintian -I --pedantic jampal_02.01.05-1.dsc gives no error. I am looking for a sponsor for my package jampal. * Package name

Re: RFS: tsung (2nd try)

2011-07-15 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 16:57, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com wrote: Le samedi 25 juin 2011 17:16:58, Ignace Mouzannar a écrit : Dear mentors, Hi Ignace :) Hi Damien :) Here are the details of the package [1]: --8---8-- * Package name    :

RFS: pynagram (updated package, second attempt)

2011-07-15 Thread Umang Varma
Dear mentors and debian-python, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1 of my package pynagram. The previous sponsor has indicated that he is too busy to sponsor pynagram. I had tried to seek a new sponsor by sending an RFS only to the d-py list and didn't find any. In my

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package, second attempt)

2011-07-15 Thread Umang Varma
I am not dead, however. I recently fixed a bug [1] when I received an email about it. With this release, I updated the debian package to use newer packaging tools (`py_support` - `dh_python2`; source format `1.0` - `3.0 (quilt)`). Also, there is one open bug report [2] in the Ubuntu package. I