On Wed, 03 Aug 2011, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
What do your mean exactly by sorted ?
sorted using the 'sort' program ?
sorted like the un-mangled symbols ?
IIRC it's sorted alphabetically on the string that appears in the symbols
file (i.e. un-mangeld symbol in your case). The tags are
Hi Kilian,
Le 03/08/2011 22:44, Kilian Krause a écrit :
[...]
I've uploaded a new version, tagged 0.8.0-1, to mentors.
I haven't pushed to the git repo yet.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.8.0-1.dsc
Very good. Built, Signed, Uploaded.
Please don't
Please find here the new version of the package:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aescrypt.
* Package name: aescrypt
Version : 3.05-1
Upstream Author :Glenn Washburn cr...@berlios.de
Paul E. Jones pau...@packetizer.com
Le Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:02:44 +0200,
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org a écrit :
IIRC it's sorted alphabetically on the string that appears in the symbols
file (i.e. un-mangeld symbol in your case). The tags are ignored for the
sort.
ok In fact my symbols where alphabetically sorted using
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:13:52AM +, mezgani ali wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: [fill in].
Huh?
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aescrypt
- Source repository: deb-src
Dear Kilian
Thank you for your review of my package.
1. Done.
2. Done.
3. override_dh_auto_install section is removed, please see No. 4 and comments
had been added to override_dh_makeshlibs section.
4. Initially, I used libccid for my reference. I think putting Info.plist to
/etc is for
Sorry, the upload of the package failed but, if you check the new sources
now, you'll find that the copyright is changed and i've joined the text mail
of new license, from upstream author.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at
Hi Ali,
mezgani ali wrote:
Sorry, the upload of the package failed but, if you check the new sources
now, you'll find that the copyright is changed and i've joined the text mail
of new license, from upstream author.
Upstream doesn't seem to understand that their freeware license is not
free:
Benoît Knecht wrote:
mezgani ali wrote:
Sorry, the upload of the package failed but, if you check the new sources
now, you'll find that the copyright is changed and i've joined the text mail
of new license, from upstream author.
Upstream doesn't seem to understand that their freeware
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1 of my package
dpkg-awk.
It builds these binary packages:
dpkg-awk - Gawk script to parse /var/lib/dpkg/{status,available} and Package
Here is the 'lintian' commandline I ran, and its output:
$ lintian -IE --pedantic
no output
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndpmon,
* Package name : ndpmon
Version : 1.4.0-2
Upstream Author : frederic.b...@loria.fr
* URL : http://ndpmon.sourceforge.net/index.html
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Section
Hi John,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John R. Baskwill jr...@psu.edu wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndpmon,
* Package name : ndpmon
Version : 1.4.0-2
If your first attempt at getting sponsored and uploaded didn't take,
you'd keep
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Matt Zagrabelny mzagr...@d.umn.edu wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John R. Baskwill jr...@psu.edu wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndpmon,
* Package name : ndpmon
Version : 1.4.0-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
On 04.08.2011 17:08, John R. Baskwill wrote:
Thanks very much for your reply. This is my first attempt at getting
sponsored. The first upload was OK, but based on the reply I received from
mentors.debian.net, I changed the clean target
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John R. Baskwill jr...@psu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Matt Zagrabelny mzagr...@d.umn.edu wrote:
Hi John,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:18 AM, John R. Baskwill jr...@psu.edu wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
Hi John,
John R. Baskwill wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndpmon,
* Package name : ndpmon
Version : 1.4.0-2
Upstream Author : frederic.b...@loria.fr
* URL : http://ndpmon.sourceforge.net/index.html
* License
2011/8/4 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org
Hi John,
John R. Baskwill wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndpmon,
* Package name : ndpmon
Version : 1.4.0-2
Upstream Author : frederic.b...@loria.fr
* URL :
2011/8/4 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org
From a quick look at your package:
- Your .deb contains plenty of .{c,h,o} files, and the full source in
/usr/src; I don't think it's what you intended to do, is it?
The original source code installed the .{c,h,o} files into
John R. Baskwill wrote:
2011/8/4 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org
[...]
From a quick look at your package:
- You have a debian/patches/debian-changes-1.4.0-1 patch that is
probably not intentional.
- It would be great if you could use DEP-5 [1] for your
John R. Baskwill wrote:
2011/8/4 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org
From a quick look at your package:
- Your .deb contains plenty of .{c,h,o} files, and the full source in
/usr/src; I don't think it's what you intended to do, is it?
The original source code installed the
What is the correct way to handle the watch file in a multi-tarball source
package?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
--
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-1
of my package flush.
It builds these binary packages:
flush - GTK-based BitTorrent client
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Hi Kilian,
I just uploaded following changes for packages l2tp-ipsec-vpn and
l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon
- deleted postinst, postrm, prerm (l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon)
- removed hard coded arch (l2tp-ipsec-vpn, l2tp-ipsec-vpn-daemon)
- simplified rules by putting all dependencies into make file
Benoît, i've received a message from upstream, telling that the application
is totally free, without any restriction for modification or redistribution.
in the fact, i insert message text in the copyright file.
Please take a look
2011/8/4 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org
Benoît Knecht
mezgani ali wrote:
Benoît, i've received a message from upstream, telling that the application
is totally free, without any restriction for modification or redistribution.
in the fact, i insert message text in the copyright file.
Please take a look
I've seen that, but they need to make that
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:58:01AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
What is the correct way to handle the watch file in a multi-tarball source
package?
There is none. See [1] for details.
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531321
--
Best regards,
Kilian
* Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org [110804 20:54]:
I've seen that, but they need to make that perfectly clear in the
license header of each file in the tarball. An email sent to you and
reproduced in the debian/copyright file is not enough.
There is nothing special about the source files.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:01:51PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-1
of my package flush.
Looks good, dput is currently running.
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
Hi César,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:26:46PM +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote:
Hi Kilian,
[...]
- Have your binary chmod 4750
- with uid 0 (thus the setUID) and
- group whateveryournewgroupname
In debian/postinst that would look like:
chmod 4750 $BINARY
chown 0:$GID $BINARY
where $GID is
El Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:15:53 -0500
Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz xbyt...@gmail.com escribió:
El Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:52:54 +0200
Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org escribió:
Hi Edgar,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:53:44AM -0500, Edgar Antonio Palma de la
Cruz wrote:
El Tue, 02 Aug 2011
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org [110804 20:54]:
I've seen that, but they need to make that perfectly clear in the
license header of each file in the tarball. An email sent to you and
reproduced in the debian/copyright file is not enough.
There is nothing
Il giorno gio, 04/08/2011 alle 22.48 +0200, Sven Hoexter ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:01:51PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-1
of my package flush.
Looks good, dput is currently running.
Really thank you!
Hi Guo,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:04:00PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.0-1
of my package herculesstudio.
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/herculesstudio/herculesstudio_1.3.0-1.dsc
Thanks!
Btw. you've got still an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dfu-programmer.
* Package name: dfu-programmer
Version : 0.5.4-0.2
Upstream Author : weston_schm...@alumni.purdue.edu
* URL : http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xxxterm.
* Package name: xxxterm
Version : 1.471-1
Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom ma...@peereboom.us)
* URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/XXXTerm
* License : ISC, MIT,
I noticed that RFS's from debexpo don't include a package description.
I'd prefer to see at least the short description without having to
visit the website, and personally I'd like to see the full description
too, at least for new packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Are debian source packages required to follow
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
A. Registered Categories, of freedesktop's Desktop Menu Specification?
This document is only a draft, it is seriously messed up, and no
one seems to be interested in fixing its flaws.
Real
37 matches
Mail list logo
