Re: RFS: sxiv

2011-09-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/08/2011 12:44 PM, Daniel Echeverry wrote: Hi, 2011/9/7 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org mailto:jw...@debian.org * Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com mailto:epsilo...@gmail.com, 2011-09-07, 16:15: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_0.9-1.dsc I

Re: RFS: sxiv

2011-09-08 Thread Guido van Steen
sxiv is in sid already... On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote: On 09/08/2011 12:44 PM, Daniel Echeverry wrote: Hi, 2011/9/7 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org mailto:jw...@debian.org * Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com

RFS: kpartsplugin (updated package)

2011-09-08 Thread Michele Gastaldo
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kpartsplugin. * Package name: kpartsplugin Version : 20110823-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Fischer fisc...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de * URL : http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~fischer/kpartsplugin/ * License :

Re: RFS: mercurial-server

2011-09-08 Thread Paul Crowley
A few words of background on this request: mercurial-server is a system that allows lots of developers to commit to the same ssh-based Mercurial repository, with sophisticated access control based on ssh keys and a restricted shell so that they can't do anything else. This is similar to what

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-08 Thread Matthias Schmitz
Hallo Joachim, Am Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:12:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de: Matthias Schmitz matth...@sigxcpu.org wrote on 2011-09-07 16:21: * Package name: slurm Version : 0.4.0-1 * License : GPL-2 Section : net Thanks for

Re: RFS: sxiv

2011-09-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com, 2011-09-07, 23:44: I tried to build the package with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, but -O2 was used as optimization anyway. Could you please fix that? Fixed. Please check out: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_0.9-1.dsc Hmm, so you

How to get a package into experimental

2011-09-08 Thread Christo Buschek
Hello, I maintain the haproxy package. There is for a long time already a very useable development version available for this package (1.5). I personally use it already in production and it adds lots of features I wouldn't wanna miss, especially the implementation of the TPROXY protocol. I was

Re: How to get a package into experimental

2011-09-08 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:28:03 +0200, Christo Buschek cr...@30loops.net wrote: production and it adds lots of features I wouldn't wanna miss, especially the implementation of the TPROXY protocol. I was wondering if its possible and if it makes sense to upload my packages for this dev version to

Re: spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2011-09-08 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
On 09/07/2011 04:47 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: Some of the compressed .js and .css files in the upstream source are not accompanied by their uncompressed originals. I've now put those in debian/extra_sources, to be able to generate the

Re: spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2011-09-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: Upstream is only GIT, there are no official releases yet (I've asked, since the application is already widely used). There is also nothing like build time, since upstream more or less advises to use git clone to put the application in

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Matthias Schmitz matth...@sigxcpu.org wrote on 2011-09-08 13:17: home of the source is already git.debian.org [1]. Or did you think its better to have a downloadable .tgz around? On http://git.debian.org/?p=users/matthias-guest/slurm.git;a=summary you have only the detailed changes of your

Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
Hello, I'm trying to do an NMU of package mdadm, but my upload is failing on one of the files, mdadm-udeb_3.1.4-1+8efb9d1.1_amd64.udeb; I get a 403 Forbidden response. I am using the dput information spcified on my mentors personal page, uploading to mentors.debian.net via http. Does anyone

Re: spotweb_0~20110903+gitab1d95b4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2011-09-08 Thread Michael Tautschnig
[...] In this case I would get upstream to remove them from git and generate the compressed versions during the Debian package build process. If upstream doesn't want to remove the compressed versions from git then your get-orig-source target should remove them when creating a tarball for

Re: Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package

2011-09-08 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, On 08.09.2011 18:22, Tim Gokcen wrote: I'm trying to do an NMU of package mdadm, but my upload is failing on one of the files, mdadm-udeb_3.1.4-1+8efb9d1.1_amd64.udeb; I get a 403 Forbidden response. Sorry about that. The author of the

Re: Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package

2011-09-08 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08.09.2011 19:08, Arno Töll wrote: Please note, the change is not live yet and will let you know once we deployed that change. ... but it is now. Note I had no source package with udeb ready. Let me know if it works. If you are still facing

Re: RFS: conque

2011-09-08 Thread harish badrinath
Hello, I have re uploaded a new version of this package after talking into account various suggestions offered by Mr Jakub Wilk. This should fix most of the issues discussed in previous mail exchanges, in this thread. To access further information about this package, please visit the following

Re: Re: Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
Thanks, I was able to upload the package successfully. -- Tim G. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e690059.6090...@gmail.com

RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mdadm. This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened against the current mdadm package; the Debian-exclusive 'checkarray' script is excessively verbose and this can lead to unwanted nuisance cron mail. The upstream version is

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 08 September 2011, Tim Gokcen wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mdadm. You really want to CC the current mdadm maintainer for your NMU, done with this mail; 'my package mdadm' is a bit ambiguous in this case as well. This upload is a fix for

RFS: comex-base

2011-09-08 Thread Armando B.
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package comex-base. * Package name: comex-base Version : 0.1.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Armando Basile hmandevt...@gmail.com * URL : http://comex-project.googlecode.com * License : GPL-2.0+ Section :

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

2011-09-08 Thread Andrew O. Shadura
Hello, I've just got a thought... We already have ITP bugs. Why not just retitle them into RFS when someone wants their package to be sponsored? -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs

2011-09-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andrew O. Shadura bugzi...@tut.by, 2011-09-08, 23:54: We already have ITP bugs. Why not just retitle them into RFS when someone wants their package to be sponsored? Not all sponsored packages are new. I'd hope most of them are not! -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RFS: Gadmin-samba (adopted package)

2011-09-08 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gadmin-samba. It builds those binary packages: gadmin-samba - GTK+ configuration tool for samba gadmin-samba-dbg - GTK+ configuration tool for samba (debug) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
I have uploaded a new version of mdadm which, on top of the previous fixes, also fixes the FTBS bug 625392 and bug 63380. I am therefore still/again seeking a sponsor for my NMU of package mdadm. This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened against the current mdadm package, as well as an

Re: RFS: mercurial-server

2011-09-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Crowley p...@lshift.net, 2011-09-08, 11:23: A change in the most recent revision of Mercurial, 1.9, stopped mercurial-server from working - mercurial doesn't offer a stable API, so extensions just have to catch up when it changes. Do you mean your package doesn't work at all in

Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki

2011-09-08 Thread Chris Knadle
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 08:15:24 PM, Robert Strobl wrote: Hi, I implemented your feedback. The updated version now concerns PmWiki's current upstream stable release 2.2.29. Please find the package files at: http://share.gloriabyte.de/pmwiki/ Best regards, Robert Greetings, Robert.

Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki

2011-09-08 Thread Strobl, Robert
Hello, thank you for all your feedback :) I'm currently about to move. Therefore I think that it may take some time till I will be able to bring in your ideas and publish the next release. You will hear from me soon again ;) Best regards, Robert Am 09.09.2011 um 01:59 schrieb Chris Knadle: