On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made
(and provide comments)?
You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
What is This has to be exported to make some magic below work. (before
'export
(Note: I didn't have a look at either package; I merely read the
preceding discussion in the bug log)
From what I've read so far, my impression is that this is not a
technical issue, but more a social / team-work... misunderstanding,
perhaps.
So read my comments below, with these things in mind.
On 2011-09-21, onlyjob only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
* Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the
monopoly for packaging?
* If ITP always have priority, aren't we sending a wrong message
for ambitious maintainers who might be tempted to create ITP early in
order
Hi,
When trying to upload packages to mentors.debian.net it fails due to
time issue's. It seems like mentors is running behind in time.
Or is it just me?
Regards,
Jeroen Nijhof
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeroen,
On 21.09.2011 11:22, Jeroen Nijhof wrote:
Hi Arno,
E: libpam-tacplus: tar-errors-from-data ./lib/security/pam_tacplus.so:
time stamp 2011-09-21 08:46:23 is 6411.189313009 s in the future
Don't worry, that's Lintian, not a reject. Your
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:15 +0200, Jeroen Nijhof wrote:
Hi,
When trying to upload packages to mentors.debian.net it fails due to
time issue's. It seems like mentors is running behind in time.
Or is it just me?
Same message for me:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Same message for me:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
Now it really is (again).
If both of you care enough, you
Hi Arno,
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:02 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Same message for me:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
Now it really is (again).
If both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.09.2011 12:10, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
PS I can't delete my previous uploaded package: it gives me an internal
error 500, in details:
That's a known (and fixed) bug, supposed to be deployed soon.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
Hi Andrey,
Thank you very much for your feedback.
On 21 September 2011 16:31, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made
(and provide comments)?
You didn't fix Vcs-*
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:11 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 21.09.2011 12:10, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
PS I can't delete my previous uploaded package: it gives me an internal
error 500, in details:
That's a known (and fixed) bug, supposed to be deployed soon.
Right, thanks.
No more lintian
Dear Gergely,
What a brilliant explanation!
All the questions answered - much appreciated.
Thank you, thank you.
All the best,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Dear Sune,
Thank for explaining this.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
On 21 September 2011 19:11, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2011-09-21, onlyjob only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
* Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the
monopoly for packaging?
* If ITP always
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:13:33PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
I can't quite do it yet because I have no public repository.
Then remove the tags. They are optional.
Given that our only option is merge, it looks like there will be no
second
Hi Andrey,
What is This has to be exported to make some magic below work. (before
'export DH_OPTIONS')?
Hmm, apparently a remnants after dh_make
No, looks like a blind copy-paste.
Fair enough, that could be the case of momentarily blindness of mine. :)
If At the moment this version
Hi,
I do not sponsor very much, but I am a bit unhappy about having comment
possibilities on both mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information
not forwarded. This results in duplicate work (for example I reviewed a
package that already had a review on mentors.d.n pointing out the same
Thanks it's working now.
Regards,
Jeroen
On 09/21/2011 12:02 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
Same message for me:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd
I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time.
Now it really is
I wanted to comment on this thread, but for some reason, it always fell
off my radar. No more!
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
I do not sponsor very much,
While I don't sponsor at all at the moment, because I'm not a DD right
now, if and when I become one, I do wish to sponsor from
Hi,
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
- mentors.d.n automatically closes RFS bugs for uploaded packages or
packages that were removed from there. It may also automatically
close inactive bugs.
Apart from closing inactive bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
aside from my comments below I fully agree to both of your mails.
On 21.09.2011 14:33, Gergely Nagy wrote:
but I am a bit unhappy about having comment possibilities on both
mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information not forwarded.
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
- mentors.d.n automatically closes RFS bugs for uploaded packages or
packages that were removed from there. It may also automatically
close inactive bugs.
Dear list,
I am currently packaging the wcslib package (Bug #641624) as my first
Debian package, and I am wondering about the naming conventions. The
package contains two libraries, some tools and an common API
documentation for both libraries. I would now make the following binary
packages:
-
Hi,
2011/9/20 Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org:
A few nitpickings from the sideline, if you don't mind (IANADD applies,
and so on and so forth):
* It would perhaps be a good idea to add a few more headers to
debian/patches/01_license-headers.patch, like fill in the Author
* Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org, 2011-09-21, 11:47:
I do not sponsor very much, but I am a bit unhappy about having comment
possibilities on both mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information
not forwarded.
Same here.
- A new pseudo-package mentors.debian.org (or whatever) is
On 09/21/2011 12:49 PM, Daniel Kauffman wrote:
... for serving Adobe socket policy files.
What's that? How do you make them?
The package is ready for sponsorship and can be downloaded from:
http://socketpolicyserver.com
1/ The package is a native package, which isn't required for an Apache
Hi,
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
- Comments are sent to the BTS. Tags are used as follows:
- moreinfo: Open questions or changes are required before an upload.
- confirmed: Somebody did review the package and thinks it is
okay. (Not needed when the package is directly uploaded.)
Let
* Ole Streicher debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2011-09-21, 16:42:
I am currently packaging the wcslib package (Bug #641624) as my first
Debian package, and I am wondering about the naming conventions. The
package contains two libraries, some tools and an common API
documentation for both
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
- pending (closing the bug): Somebody will (did) upload the package
(no further changes required).
I'm not sure if pending would be ever useful (except maybe for
uploads to DELAYED).
Hmm, I thought about using it in case the sponsor did review
Gergely Nagy alger...@madhouse-project.org writes:
Wouldn't the fixed tag work for cases where the package is reviewed,
and will be uploaded VerySoon(tm)?
Please disregard that, I had a brainfart. Apologies for the noise.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2011-09-21, 22:48:
unless you want to keep multiple versions of it in the archive at the
same people.
Err, of course I meant s/people/time/. Thanks to Arno for spotting this.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
our (not so) old host running http://mentors.debian.net was replaced
right before by shiny new hardware. For you, as user you shouldn't
hopefully notice the switch. The new hardware is much more powerful and
has plenty of disk space.
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pysolfc.
* Package name: pysolfc
Version : 2.0-1
* URL : http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
* Programming Lang: Python
* Description : A Python solitaire game collection
It builds the binary package:
32 matches
Mail list logo
