Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "procmeter3".
Package name: procmeter3
Version : 3.5d-2
Upstream Author : [Please put procmeter
in the subject line]
URL : http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/procmeter3/
License : GPL-2+
Secti
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 14:55, Stefan Ott wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 18:04, Stefan Ott wrote:
>>> Thanks for noticing. I re-uploaded the package with a corrected
>>> version of debian/copyright.
>>
>> Ah btw, I forgot to mention that this package is already in Debian.
>> The reason why I'm l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package update for "scorched3d".
This updated fixes a FTBFS and closes RC bug #650579.
* Package name: scorched3d
Version : 43.2a.dfsg-6
Upstream Author : Gavin Camp
* URL :
Unsubscription
You are much more likely to find sponsors if you give some information
about what your software does.
More tips for attracting sponsors in the FAQ:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.d
Ask upstream to remove them from their tarballs and remove them in `make clean`.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "no-dice".
* Package name: no-dice
Version : 0.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Stephen M. Webb
* URL : http://no-dice.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-3+
Sec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dearest mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "agar".
* Package name: agar
Version : 1.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Julien Nadeau-Carriere
* URL : http://libagar.org/
* License : BSD 2-clause
Secti
Hi there.
I've got several projects in SourceForge and I would like to add the
following to Debian, as they're reasonably mature
v3c: http://sourceforge.net/projects/v3c/
treedb: http://sourceforge.net/projects/treedb/
meta-treedb: http://sourceforge.net/projects/meta-treedb/
v3c-qt: http://so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update of the package "mmpong".
This change updates the packaging standards-version and fixes a FTBFS
bug (#624144).
* Package name: mmpong
Version : 0.9.1-2
Upstream Author : André G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package package
"xgalaga". This update fixes a number of lintian and buildd warnings
and closes #641293.
* Package name: xgalaga
Version : 2.1.1.0-4
Upstream Author : J
Hi,
my upstream ships documentation in PDF format in the normal sources.
Upon build, I re-create those files[1]. The newly generated PDF files
differ from the originally shipped ones. So, I have a problem asserting
that "debian/rules clean" gives me the same source tree as "dpkg-source
-x" which
Hello,
Le jeudi 01 décembre 2011 à 05:17 -0500, John W. Eaton a écrit :
> On 1-Dec-2011, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> | Hello John,
> |
> | Le jeudi 01 décembre 2011 à 04:45 -0500, John W. Eaton a écrit :
> | > On 30-Nov-2011, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> | >
> | > | Octave people: can we un
Hello,
On 2011-12-11 16:21, Arno Töll wrote:
> Debhelper's compatibility level is an orthogonal approach. It's a
> promise that your build procedures do _not_ break when using certain
> features. If you are building a package with debhelper 8.9.something
> installed which has, say, debhelper compa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.12.2011 11:11, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> but I disagree with you if you claim
>> that there would be no reason to use debhelper 8 at all.
>
> I didn't say so, see above.
I'm sorry, you are right.
> One more example:
> -8<-
> $ cupt depends
Hi Goswin,
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:16:32PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Luis Henriques writes:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm".
> >
> > * Package name: xxxterm
> >Version : 1:1.9.0-1
> >Upstream Author : Several (Mar
Luis Henriques writes:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xxxterm".
>
> * Package name: xxxterm
>Version : 1:1.9.0-1
>Upstream Author : Several (Marco Peereboom )
> * URL : http://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/XXXTerm
> * License
Hi Mr./Mrs. Name,
"With No Name" writes:
> in the changes/upload file I have only those three files, but I need the
>
> package_1.2.3.tar.gz
>
> too. How do I do this?
See the -sa option of dpkg-buildpackage / dpkg-genchanges.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 02:17:27PM +0100, With No Name wrote:
> in the changes/upload file I have only those three files, but I need the
>
> package_1.2.3.tar.gz
>
> too. How do I do this?
Add -sa to the build command you use.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I was searching the Debian website forward and back but I do not more find
the page, where it was written.
I mean, I have the
package_1.2.3-4.dsc
package_1.2.3-4.diff
package_1.2.3.tar.gz
from the last version of a debian package which was removed and now I
rebuild it for e.g. squeeze an
Hi Muneeb,
On 2011-12-11 05:16, Muneeb Shaikh wrote:
> Okay, According to the suggestion I have reverted back the change as
> it's not required.
[...]
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unetbootin/unetbootin_565-3.dsc
>
> The Git repository is at:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-m
Hello Arno,
On 2011-12-10 20:00, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 10.12.2011 19:19, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > This is generally not a valid reason. For example, this makes it
> > impossible to build the package on the system which has debhelper v7
> > installed, for no reason.
>
> Well, given that this
22 matches
Mail list logo
