Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cover-thumbnailer
* Package name: cover-thumbnailer
Version : 0.8.3-1
Upstream Author : Fabien LOISON f...@flogisoft.com
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package downtimed
Package name: downtimed
Version : 0.5-2
Upstream Author : Janne Snabb opensou...@epipe.com
URL : http://dist.epipe.com/downtimed/
License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rarpd
Package name: rarpd
Version : 0.981107-8
Upstream Author : Alexey Kutznetsov, Jakub Jelinek
URL : (extinct)
License : GPL-2
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mitlm
* Package name: mitlm
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Bo-June (Paul) Hsu bo...@mit.edu
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mitlm/
* License : BSD
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sptk
* Package name: sptk
Version : 3.5
Upstream Author : Keiichiro Oura ura...@nitech.ac.jp
* URL : http://sp-tk.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Hi,
On 07.04.2012 12:42, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
downtimed - monitor of downtime, shutdown, and crashes
this sounds quite interesting. I'll likely have a look at this at some
point this weekend unless someone beats me on it or Sven finds time.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:14:44AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
What about repagen i.e. REadable PAssword GENerator ? Is it OK.?
That is nice.
Good. But. There are too many things to be renamed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659047
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com wrote:
ecosystem. Consider for instance that if one day you suddenly can not
contribute anymore, somebody else will need to care of the package. Summed
together, even removals takes time.
It would be a nice behavior, if
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:13:35PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
First, If you're proposing a different algorithm for password
generation, have you looked into contributing the algorithm to apg? If
not, why?
Please also note that while apg generates secure passwords, rpg doesn't
care about such
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:15:20AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:26:30AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 01:22:55AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:29:47PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
I made this 2 diagram which might
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libreoffice-converter
* Package name: libreoffice-converter
Version : 3.3.34.1+ds-3
Upstream Author : Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz
Jan Holesovsky
On tor, 2012-04-05 at 15:32 +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/postgres-xc
You should probably fix the lintian warnings shown on that page first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:10:54PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
You should probably fix the lintian warnings shown on that page first.
Yes, I will start packaging it from scratch with new version 0.9.7
***
### Vladimir Stavrinov
### vstavri...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:13:35PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
maintainers to request removals before they leave Debian. You seem to
have an overly simplified view of how the distribution works.
You don't let me know something new.
Now, about the package in question. The alternative
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package stl-manual
* Package name: stl-manual
Version : 3.30-13
Upstream Author : SGI
* URL :
Le Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:46:33PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov a écrit :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659047
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652718
http://mentors.debian.net/package/rpg
Hi,
There is no need to rename bugs and mentors uploads retroactively.
Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com writes:
But for a last at least 15 years I've wrote tens of such scripts, that
I am using for years in my work and life with enjoy and no problems.
And now, I think, why don't make those lot of software available for
Debian users? But I see: because
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:05:25AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
As a side note, I think that the comments about security in this
thread are very relevant. If your package were accepted in Debian, it
would need to meet Debian's and Debian's users expectations, not only
your vision as an
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
barrier to entry there: Debian should be a coherent operating system
Very good. But to keep system in coherent state You should not only
build barrier on entry, but also remove packages that break such
coherence. And this should be not
No need to send copies to me of messages that you're also sending to
this forum.
Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com writes:
So I don't understand, why do You think my package is worse of those
garbage and how it break coherence.
I don't have a position one way or another on whether any
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:48:27AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
No need to send copies to me of messages that you're also sending to
this forum.
Sorry, it was my fault: first I send it to You instead of list, then
notice this and send it to list.
So I don't understand, why do You think my
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
vstavri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
barrier to entry there: Debian should be a coherent operating system
Very good. But to keep system in coherent state You should not only
build barrier
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
vstavri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:48:27AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
So I don't understand, why do You think my package is worse of those
garbage and how it break coherence.
I don't have a position one way or another on
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 11:20:55PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
to get rid of it. It's thus reasonable that we want to make sure
packages are in good shape for entry in Debian. It's also natural that
It is very easy to execute this task: please, read this shell script. It
is short and simple
Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com writes:
The problem is that I don't see this review process here. Instead,
all of You are explaining what Debian is and what is not. But I've got
no much new. You are trying to breach into opened door. But point is
that all this discussion have no
25 matches
Mail list logo
