Bug#668007: RFS: cover-thumbnailer/0.8.3-1 [ITP]

2012-05-31 Thread Bart Martens
Hi, The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120601044615.ga20...@mast

Re: Packaging a new release of released SW, not considered by the DM?

2012-05-31 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:22:21PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Hi, > > A Short question. Is it possible to ITP a new release of some software > not being even considered by the DM, for whatever reason. Wishlist bugs > are submitted, etc. According to if there is no reply of bug reports, > there

Bug#675374: marked as done (RFS: popplerkit.framework/0.0.20051227svn-7)

2012-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:14:12 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: popplerkit.framework/0.0.20051227svn-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #675374, regarding RFS: popplerkit.framework/0.0.20051227svn-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#675341: marked as done (RFS: batmon.app/0.6-1)

2012-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:14:12 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: batmon.app/0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #675341, regarding RFS: batmon.app/0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: retitle to RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager

2012-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 663431 RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Bug #663431 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: taskcoach/1.3.12-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager Changed Bug title to 'RFS: taskcoach/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- friendly task manager' from 'R

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-05-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-05-31, 23:37: Why --multi in the update-inetd call? Because the new reconf-inetd entries are added before the postinst runs. update-inetd will see multiple telnet entries and alert the user that multiple servers exist for that service. --multi allows update-inetd to

Bug#673096: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"

2012-05-31 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
On 30/05/12 20:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What > exactly is the problem with it? Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1]. I am updating my unreleased 2.2.4-1 packaging, and hope to have a 2.2.5-1 package

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-05-31 Thread Jonathan McCrohan
On 31/05/12 19:04, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-05-25, 23:57: >> * Use reconf-inetd to provide nyancat-server configs > > Now I realized the old postrm was broken... Ooops. Yes, I realised that too while I was creating this package, but it will be fixed by this postinst. > Why

Bug#675403: RFS: viewpdf.app/1:0.2dfsg1-4 [RC, ITA]

2012-05-31 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "viewpdf.app". This upload would fix #453437, #615353, #619258, #675222. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/viewpdf.app/viewpdf.app_0.2dfsg1-4.dsc Changes: viewpdf.app (1:0.2dfsg1-4

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-31 Thread Aron Xu
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Benjamin Eltzner wrote: > Hi Aron, > >> qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but >> qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be >> possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and release a new >> version? > >

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

2012-05-31 Thread Didier Raboud
(Hereby ignoring the tone of your private ping) Le mercredi, 16 mai 2012 23.23:02, Boris Pek a écrit : > Great! Could you look on the package now? Yeah. I took a look. 1) Versioning So, what I wrote before about the version is not completely true: bumping the epoch is not _strictly_ needed as

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-31 Thread Benjamin Eltzner
Hi Aron, > qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but > qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be > possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and release a new > version? This is indeed a serious issue. I spoke with the upstream author (A

Bug#675388: RFS: python-cups/1.9.61-0.1 [RC] [NMU]

2012-05-31 Thread Rob Adams
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cups" * Package name: python-cups Version : 1.9.61-0.1 Upstream Author : Tim Waugh * URL : http://cyberelk.net/tim/software/pycups/ * License : GPLv2

Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1

2012-05-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-05-25, 23:57: * Use reconf-inetd to provide nyancat-server configs Now I realized the old postrm was broken... Ooops. Why --multi in the update-inetd call? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#675374: RFS: popplerkit.framework/0.0.20051227svn-7

2012-05-31 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "popplerkit.framework". This upload would fix #660109 and #661075. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/popplerkit.framework/popplerkit.framework_0.0.20051227svn-7.dsc Changes: poppler

RE: Architecture dependensie

2012-05-31 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Thanks for explenation -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Gergely Nagy [mailto:alger...@balabit.hu] Verzonden: donderdag 31 mei 2012 14:45 Aan: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Onderwerp: Re: Architecture dependensie Bas van den Dikkenberg writes: > Hello, > > I am trying to make burp work

Re: Architecture dependensie

2012-05-31 Thread Gergely Nagy
Bas van den Dikkenberg writes: > Hello, > > I am trying to make burp work on HPPA and powerpcspe architectures and > there for I want to specify witch version of debhelper he must juse. You're trying to do the wrong thing: debhelper is arch:all, so it will be the same across architectures. If yo

Architecture dependensie

2012-05-31 Thread Bas van den Dikkenberg
Hello, I am trying to make burp work on HPPA and powerpcspe architectures and there for I want to specify witch version of debhelper he must juse. My control file looks like this. Source: burp Section: utils Priority: extra Maintainer: Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Build-Depends: deb

Bug#675341: RFS: batmon.app/0.6-1

2012-05-31 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "batmon.app". http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/batmon.app/batmon.app_0.6-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: batmon.app (0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release.

Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

2012-05-31 Thread Boris Pek
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: h