Bug#658835: RFS: aspsms-t/1.3.1-1 (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport for your xmpp/jabber server

2012-07-23 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear Bart, 2012/7/22 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org: Hi Marco, The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens The package was automatically removed by mentors.debian.net, see: 2012/7/15 mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net: Your package aspsms-t

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-07-23 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Hi Bart, On Saturday 21 July 2012 16:41:15 Bart Martens wrote: Hi Francesco, I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-14 11:00. The information in debian/copyright is yet not complete. One example is that the copyright and license of the file

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Francesco, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile | Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright | information and distribution license in the file | /usr/share/doc/package/copyright. The copyright information and distribution

Bug#661853: RFS: kpdftool/0.23.1-1 [ITP] -- GUI to manipulate PDF and PS files using GhostScript and ImageMagick

2012-07-23 Thread Simone Rossetto
Hi Bart. The package has been automatically removed from mentors because it hasn't found a sponsor in 20 weeks. During that period I received only a comment from a DD telling me that the upstream sources were not suitable for Debian because there were some security issues. I forwarded that

Bug#661853: RFS: kpdftool/0.23.1-1 [ITP] -- GUI to manipulate PDF and PS files using GhostScript and ImageMagick

2012-07-23 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:22:22PM +0200, Simone Rossetto wrote: Should I do something here on this bug report while waiting? If there is no package waiting to be uploaded, it's probably better to close the bug and open a new one once there's something available for potential sponsors. --

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-07-23 Thread Francesco Cecconi
Hi Bart, Sorry for the Mistake. On Monday 23 July 2012 09:58:58 Bart Martens wrote: Hi Francesco, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile | Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright | information and distribution license in

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-07-23 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Francesco Cecconi wrote: I have updated the license to GFDL, but since the version 1.1 is not in debian common-licenses directory I'm using for copyright information: test/manuals/res_all/mini_ker/*.html, test/manuals/res_info/mini_ker/*.html

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-07-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you for reviewing this package! On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: I found this in debian/copyright : Source: branch from http://launchpad.net/bzr-email and hand-packed by tar cf - | gzip -9. That's not really detailed information. I

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:25:56PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: (adding also DMUA): - DM-Upload-Allowed. Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#661853: marked as done (RFS: kpdftool/0.23.1-1 [ITP] -- GUI to manipulate PDF and PS files using GhostScript and ImageMagick)

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:43:20 +0200 with message-id CAEBQdhgeHkJr2WAOXwNe1=29-1qqtkos0u23dnct3f8343y...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#661853: RFS: kpdftool/0.23.1-1 [ITP] -- GUI to manipulate PDF and PS files using GhostScript and ImageMagick has caused the Debian Bug

Bug#661831: RFS: texi2html/5.0-1 -- Convert Texinfo files to HTML

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Francesco Cecconi wrote: On Monday 23 July 2012 09:58:58 Bart Martens wrote: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile | Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright | information and

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-07-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: (adding also DMUA): - DM-Upload-Allowed. Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ? No. That is simply my intent, means I want to add DMUA: yes, and I hope it would also reviewed to be or not to

Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
Hello, I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I contacted Wesley J. Landaker last week and sent him an updated packages (closing some bugs and upgrading upstream version). Here is a resume of changes I've made: libgringotts - - Call dh_autoreconf to update the build

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:03:10PM +0200, Jose G. López wrote: Hello, I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I contacted Wesley J. Landaker last week He told me to contact here and try to find a sponsor. So he agreed. I'm not sure if I have to send an ITA against wnpp ...

Re: RFS: libnet 1.1.6 (try #2)

2012-07-23 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
FYI: Re-uploaded without -Werror. On Sunday 22 July 2012, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: On Friday 20 Jul 2012 20:44:28 Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:44:15AM +0100, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: Can someone please upload the new version of libnet to unstable? This

Re: Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]

2012-07-23 Thread José Luis Segura Lucas
I know that these are difficult times for the new packages, but a little of charity for a new Debian maintainer, please :-P Best regards El 26/06/12 17:36, Benoît Knecht escribió: severity 678992 wishlist thanks Hi José, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my

Processed: fbcmd: block ITP 666745 by RFS 682519

2012-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 666745 by 682519 Bug #666745 [wnpp] ITP: fbcmd -- command line interface (CLI) for facebook Bug #666744 [wnpp] ITP: fbcmd -- command line interface (CLI) for facebook 666745 was not blocked by any bugs. 666745 was not blocking any bugs.

Bug#682567: ITA: gringotts -- secure password and data storage manager

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Hi, I would like to take over maintainership of gringotts. I have contacted Wesley J. Landaker, the actual maintainer, and I have his approval. He kindly pointed out the steps to follow the adoption. I've uploaded

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
El 23/07/12 17:23, Bart Martens escribió: I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed. I can upload the packages to mentors for review but I prefer to wait for instructions. I suggest to proceed without waiting. Regards, Bart Martens Thanks Bart, I did as you say but I

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Jose G. López wrote: El 23/07/12 17:23, Bart Martens escribió: I suggest to open an ITA briefly stating that he agreed. I can upload the packages to mentors for review but I prefer to wait for instructions. I suggest to proceed without

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 23.07.2012 22:19, Bart Martens wrote: The package at mentors is marked needs sponsor = yes so an RFS bug is not really needed. but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag (you know, even less than about RFS bugs). -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC:

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

2012-07-23 Thread Jose G. López
Arno Töll wrote: but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag (you know, even less than about RFS bugs). Thanks Arno, but since Bart seems to be reviewing these packages, I suppose he will sponsor them. Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not