On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05:59AM +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
Arno Töll wrote:
but it certainly won't hurt. Not too many people care about that flag
(you know, even less than about RFS bugs).
Thanks Arno, but since Bart seems to be reviewing these packages, I
suppose he will sponsor
Hi,
I did run into some trouble with a fresh package which is prepared in
SVN at
Vcs-Svn:
svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/
You can obtain the source via `uscan --force-download` or
`make -f debian/rules get-orig-source` .
The package builds nicely
Hi all
I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules
which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system
does not use distutils, it just copies the files into
/usr/share/pyshared/module/.
Now, I figured it would be as easy as
* adding a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Anybody got a clue as to what I'm doing wrong here? Do I need to add an
extra binary python3-foo package?
As far as I'm aware, yes, you have to add an extra binary in
debian/control if you want to build both python2
Hi,
On 24/07/12 09:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
$ gcc-4.7 -I/usr/include/python2.6 -c python-code/support-code/_sparsemat.cpp
-std=c++0x
python-code/support-code/_sparsemat.cpp: In function ‘void
__Pyx_RaiseArgtupleInvalid(const char*, int, Py_ssize_t, Py_ssize_t,
Py_ssize_t)’:
Hi Michael (2012.07.24_10:15:51_+0200)
I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules
which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system
does not use distutils, it just copies the files into
/usr/share/pyshared/module/.
That's probably not ideal.
On 07/24/2012 12:12 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Michael (2012.07.24_10:15:51_+0200)
I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules
which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system
does not use distutils, it just copies the files into
Hi,
Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:34:55 +0200 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net
napísal:
Of course, you should try again. Just put some more salt, in hope to
whet the prospective sponsor's appetite.
thanks, i will wait some time now. IMO it seems as useless to try it in
freeze time.
regards
--
package sponsorship-requests
severity 682680 wishlist
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 682680 not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:55:49PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
severity 682680 wishlist
Bug #682680 [sponsorship-requests] RFS:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 680061 by 682680
Bug #680061 [wnpp] ITP: clean-compiler - The Clean language compiler
680061 was not blocked by any bugs.
680061 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 680061: 682680
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hello Martin,
Remove multi-arch support:
debian/control:
* remove lines with Multi-Arch:
* remove lines with Pre-Depends:
* Move back to dephelper (= 8)
debian/compat:
* Move back to 8
debian/rules:
* Remove lines which looks like support for multi-arch...
debian/*.install:
* change all
Hi,
I tagged this bug help because I admit I do not have any clue about
assembler programming and atomic operations. I did also forewarded the
problem upstream.
Any hint would be welcome
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be -
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012
El 24/07/12 08:09, Bart Martens escribió:
Other sponsors are welcome to review and upload these packages at any time
without talking to me.
For sure. Sorry.
Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if
I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revision
14 matches
Mail list logo
