Hello,
i am taking over the orphaned xinetd, and i am working here:
https://github.com/ltworf/xinetd-debian
the current package has a patch that basically is a replacement of the
configure script. The patch is extremely complicated and i guess not really
meant for human eyes.
I must premise
Hi all
Do *.so development symlinks in a shared-library package constitute a
policy violation? 8.1 Doesn't forbid them in the library package and 8.4
only says the should be in the -dev package.
Thanks for the help in advance
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it writes:
But the autoreconf command fails. I've tried multiple versions and it
always fails giving a long list of warnings about missing template and
then
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoheader failed with exit status: 1
xinetd doesn't use autoheader or
Michael Wild them...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Do *.so development symlinks in a shared-library package constitute a
policy violation? 8.1 Doesn't forbid them in the library package and 8.4
only says the should be in the -dev package.
From Policy 8.2:
If your package contains files
Michael Wild them...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Do *.so development symlinks in a shared-library package constitute a
policy violation? 8.1 Doesn't forbid them in the library package and 8.4
only says the should be in the -dev package.
If the *.so development symlinks prevent two versions
On 07/27/2012 10:34 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michael Wild them...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Do *.so development symlinks in a shared-library package constitute a
policy violation? 8.1 Doesn't forbid them in the library package and 8.4
only says the should be in the -dev package.
If the
Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:45:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/
| The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, 682...@bugs.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package viennacl
* Package name: viennacl
Version : 1.2.0-2
Upstream Author : Karl Rupp r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 682968 serious
Bug #682968 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.2.0-2
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
retitle 682968 RFS: viennacl/1.2.0-2 [RC]
Bug #682968 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: viennacl/1.2.0-2
Changed Bug title to 'RFS:
Hi Pedro,
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package maxwell
* Package name: maxwell
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Sandy Harrissandyinch...@gmail.com
* URL : ftp://ftp.cs.sjtu.edu.cn:990/sandy/maxwell/
* License : GPL v2
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 09:28:49AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
the current package has a patch that basically is a replacement of the
configure script. The patch is extremely complicated and i guess not really
meant for human eyes.
What i was trying to do is to use dh_autoreconf and have
Hi Albert,
Albert Huang wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tilem
* Package name: tilem
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Moody and Thibault Duponchelle (
tilem-de...@sourceforge.net)
* URL : http://lpg.ticalc.org/prj_tilem/
*
Benoît Knecht wrote:
There are a few lintian warnings that you should fix:
P: maxwell source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
W: maxwell: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/maxwell
W: maxwell: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/maxwell
P: maxwell:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
Hi Albert,
Albert Huang wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tilem
* Package name: tilem
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Moody and Thibault Duponchelle (
tilem-de...@sourceforge.net)
* URL
On 12-07-27 12:13 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Benoît Knecht wrote:
There are a few lintian warnings that you should fix:
P: maxwell source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
W: maxwell: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/maxwell
W: maxwell:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I'm not sure what you're proposing I should do.
I sometimes give feedback on a package without proposing a solution.
In this case it is, in my opinion, OK to remove the non-free parts from the
upstream tarball, and to ship
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 678343 by 678872
Bug #678343 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: tilem/2.0-1 [ITP]
678343 was not blocked by any bugs.
678343 was blocking: 678229
Added blocking bug(s) of 678343: 678872
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:17:08 +
with message-id e1suq28-0006vh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#677239: fixed in fractalnow 0.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677239,
regarding RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1 [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced fractal
generator
to be
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 682968 fit-for-wheezy
stop
Hi Michael,
I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-27 13:32.
The change to debian/gbp.conf is not mentioned in debian/changelog.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 07/27/2012 09:28 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 682968 fit-for-wheezy
stop
Hi Michael,
I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-07-27 13:32.
The change to debian/gbp.conf is not mentioned in debian/changelog.
Just uploaded a new version to m.d.n with the d/changelog entry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5012fc57@users.sourceforge.net
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jul 2012 23:36:15 +0200
with message-id 1343424975.5717.38.ca...@edge.localdomain.be
and subject line RFS: zynaddsubfx/2.4.0-1.3 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #682899,
regarding RFS: zynaddsubfx/2.4.0-1.3 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:12:40 +
with message-id 20120727221240.gl14...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: viennacl/1.2.0-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #682968,
regarding RFS: viennacl/1.2.0-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
hello
i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756.
changes since last upload:
* QA upload.
* Fix bug in postrm scripts (Closes: #681756).
* Fix a dangling symlink (/usr/bin/chmoddic - catdic) on canna package.
dsc file could be found on mentors
24 matches
Mail list logo
