Juhani Numminen writes:
> Compat level is indeed 9 (and Build-Depend on debhelper 9). Activating
> all hardening flags did produce a bit strange executable. I could not
> run it from file manager (it's Thunar 1.2.3-4+b1), it was identified as
> a "library". Running application from command line
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:54:22 +
with message-id <1346446462.26461.70.camel@julia>
and subject line rspamd/0.5.2-1 uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #685697,
regarding RFS: rspamd/0.5.2-1 [ITP] -- fast spam filtering system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
2012/8/30 Markus Koschany :
> Hi Juhani,
>
> i'm working on a debian package myself at the moment and i think the
> recommended way to implement hardening is to use dpkg-buildflags.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
Oh, I hadn't spotted that wiki page. It gave me more information abo
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:12:04 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685345,
regarding RFS: pidgin-latex/1.4.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 13:16 Fri 31 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-31, 16:40:
> >>Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong
> >>directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the
> >>current directory.” — Policy §4.9)
> >Hmm.. So I need to leave the tarballs in
* Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-31, 16:40:
Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong
directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the current
directory.” — Policy §4.9)
Hmm.. So I need to leave the tarballs in the directory from where rules
is executed? eg debian/ru
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Gary Kramlich , 2012-08-01, 23:43:
I've now uploaded the 120715 upstream release to mentors.
It appears to be here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja-build/ninja-build_120715.dsc
Why is it a native package?
"Architecture: i386 amd6
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong directory,
> too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the current directory.” —
> Policy §4.9)
Hmm.. So I need to leave the tarballs in the directory from where
rules is exec
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:27:37PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mika Pflüger writes:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU fxing an RC bug in the package
> > "obnam". The RC bug
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680670 I reported
> > myself is open and has a patch for two
9 matches
Mail list logo
