It was refused by the maintainers of that for being to non-free
On 19 Oct 2012 01:10, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote:
The problem with updating the rar package is not a problem with the
complexity of the package, it's a case of
U heeft overschreden de limiet van uw mailbox ingesteld door onze IT-service,
en vanaf nu kan je niet ontvangen van alle inkomende e-mails en ook enkele van
uw uitgaande e-mails zullen niet worden geleverd en ten slotte, uw account zal
worden 'gedeactiveerd' binnen 24 uur vanaf nu. Om dit te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
My sponsor is kil...@debian.org.
I just uploaded the new version 1.0.9-1 of my package l2tp-ipsec-vpn.
This upload contains RC bug fix #684962
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684962)
* Package name:
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Martin Meredith wrote:
It was refused by the maintainers of that for being to non-free
I see. Well, it was worth a shot. BTW, using pbuilder to set up i386 and
amd64 chroots helps a lot, at least here it has made it easy for me to do
dual-arch uploads, with two pbuilder
Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes:
RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and
amd64 on Linux.
http://rarlabs.com/download.htm
Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian
seems to work for all of the RAR files I have received recently and
* Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi [121019 13:46]:
Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes:
RAR is not open source software, they offers binaries for i386 and
amd64 on Linux.
http://rarlabs.com/download.htm
Just out of curiousity, why is this needed? The unar package in Debian
Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com writes:
It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552).
unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug
report you see my comment:
unar (not unrar!) 0.99-1 in debian wheezy seems to have rar3 support.
--
* Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi [121019 14:02]:
Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com writes:
It still does not support RAR 3.0 archives (#312552).
unrar-free and unar are two different packages. If you read the full bug
report you see my comment:
Ooos, my bad. I had read the
Ma Xiaojun damage3...@gmail.com writes:
However, rar is offered for long and now it is staying in a broken state.
So we still need to maintain it.
Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there
now is an open source solution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On 10/15/12, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Besides that:
- The two entries in debian/changelog should probably be collapsed into
one.
Updated debian/changelog file.
- The (build-)dependencies on hardening-wrapper, perl-base and
perl-modules look wrong. Why are
Hi!
Il 17/10/2012 16:19, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-10-17, 00:05:
How can I set Built-Using field? Should I set it by hand? Is it possible
to set it automatically?
Value of this field must be generated at build time. Unfortunately, there
are currently
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:50:21 +
with message-id e1tplox-0002nn...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #690010,
regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Sure, I was just suggesting that it could also be removed since there
now is an open source solution.
I don't think unar supports RAR file creation, I guess some people are
using that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:07:07 -0400
with message-id 5081f93b.8030...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690366: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690366,
regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
14 matches
Mail list logo
