Hi Timur,
I see that you have a few bugs for inadyn tagged pending and that you have
requested sponsorship in the past (RFS mentioned on bug 647703) but the package
inadyn is no longer at mentors. Where is it now ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 26/10/2012 00:55, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
Hi,
I feel like the current for-wheezy and fit-for-wheezy usertags
actually make the sponsorship-requests bug page harder to use than
it needs to be.
Hi,
(I tried answering on Saturday but I
A bug has been found in roxterm:
https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/bugs/88/.
I wouldn't consider it a high priority but the fix is very trivial, just
adding a single line of code. Should I release this for wheezy? If so,
how do I go about it? Should I open a debian bug and give it a certain
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:24:45PM +, Tony Houghton wrote:
A bug has been found in roxterm:
https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/bugs/88/.
I wouldn't consider it a high priority but the fix is very trivial, just
adding a single line of code. Should I release this for wheezy? If so,
how do I
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-28, 23:06:
Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted copyright to
its original format and modified create_orig_source to refer
dl.suckless.org.
I can't build source package anymore:
| dpkg-source: info: local changes detected,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 22/10/2012 16:38, Christian Welzel a écrit :
The package was uploaded.
Looks like it wasn't.
Regards
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Am 29.10.2012 21:47, schrieb David Prévot:
The package was uploaded.
Looks like it wasn't.
It was:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/swftools.html
But its currently waiting for its 10 days quarantine to be over.
--
MfG, Christian Welzel
GPG-Key: pub 4096R/5117E119 2011-09-19
Hey
Is there any way to make a watch-file look for git tags on
git.gnome.org? I am preparing a package for a QA upload (for after the
freeze of course) for a package that I have a hard time finding a way to
make a watch file for the releases - it uses a wordpress blog as
homepage, where it has
Hello,
I'm looking at the 'nautilus' package, and this is the contents of the file
'debian/watch':
version=3
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/nautilus/([\d\.]+)/ \
nautilus-(.*)\.tar\.xz
Nautilus, being a GNOME project, keeps its code in git.gnome.org (
Hi -
(No need to CC me, I am subscribed to the list.)
I am working on the devilspie package - which has a release mentioned
and linked in the last entry on Ross Burton's blog -
http://www.burtonini.com/
I do however have problems getting a watch-file reading the folder
where the tar.xz is.
It
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:40:30 +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
I am working on the devilspie package - which has a release mentioned
and linked in the last entry on Ross Burton's blog -
http://www.burtonini.com/
I do however have problems getting a watch-file reading the folder
where the
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:04:03 +0100
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:40:30 +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
I am working on the devilspie package - which has a release
mentioned and linked in the last entry on Ross Burton's blog -
http://www.burtonini.com/
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
I can't build source package anymore:
| dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
| git/sprop/.hg_archival.txt
| dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source
--commit
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:20:29 +
with message-id e1tt3jv-0003b9...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: zipper.app/1.4-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #677052,
regarding RFS: zipper.app/1.4-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:20:29 +
with message-id e1tt3jv-0003bf...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: fisicalab.app/0.2.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #677144,
regarding RFS: fisicalab.app/0.2.2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:20:30 +
with message-id e1tt3jw-0003bu...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: mpdcon.app/1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677081,
regarding RFS: mpdcon.app/1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:37:15 +0800
with message-id 508f678b.1090...@gmail.com
and subject line gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg (4.4.7-1) uploaded to sid
has caused the Debian Bug report #691022,
regarding RFS: gcc-4.4-doc-non-dfsg/4.4.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
17 matches
Mail list logo
