Bug#692005: RFS: libcouchbase/2.0.0~beta2-1 -- Couchbase protocol library [ITP]

2012-11-01 Thread Neutron Soutmun
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcouchbase * Package name: libcouchbase Version : 2.0.0~beta2-1 Upstream Author : Couchbase, Inc. * URL : http://www.couchbase.com/develop/c/current *

Re: Bug#690245: RFS: zgv/5.9-6 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

2012-11-01 Thread Boris Pek
Anyone interested? 2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv. It builds one binary package:   zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer Direct link for download:   

Processed: RFS: libcouchbase/2.0.0~beta2-1 -- Couchbase protocol library [ITP]

2012-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 692005 wishlist Bug #692005 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libcouchbase/2.0.0~beta2-1 -- Couchbase protocol library [ITP] Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: libcouchbase: block ITP 691903 by RFS 692005

2012-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 691903 by 692005 Bug #691903 [wnpp] ITP: libcouchbase -- Couchbase protocol library 691903 was not blocked by any bugs. 691903 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 691903: 692005 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact

Re: Bug#691577: RFS: neverball/1.5.4-6 -- 3D floor-tilting game

2012-11-01 Thread Juhani Numminen
Hi! Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:54:47 + Bart Martens ba...@debian.org kirjoitti: Hi Juhani, You wrote on the RFS: team upload (as in Debian Developer's Reference ch 5.11.7) There I read: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-team-upload If it conforms with

Bug#692065: RFS: mcrypt/2.6.8-1.3 [RC][NMU]

2012-11-01 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcrypt Package name: mcrypt Version : 2.6.8-1.3 URL : http://mcrypt.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-3 Section : utils It builds those binary

Processed: retitle to RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP]

2012-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 680546 RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP] Bug #680546 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]' stop Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#692065: RFS: mcrypt/2.6.8-1.3 [RC][NMU]

2012-11-01 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: mcrypt (2.6.8-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of overly long file names (Closes: #690924) I've reviewed this and it looks

Bug#692065: RFS: mcrypt/2.6.8-1.3 [RC][NMU]

2012-11-01 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of overly long file names (Closes: #690924) I've reviewed this and it looks mostly good. However, can you explain why you chose ERRWIDTH=PATH_MAX+1024 vs. the redhat patch WIDTH=80? I don't know exactly. It

Bug#680546: marked as done (RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP])

2012-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:20:31 + with message-id e1tu8kb-0005gk...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #680546, regarding RFS: cinnamon/1.6.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the