-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Bastien,
Le 04/11/2012 17:25, roucaries bastien a écrit :
I could as a mainteners open artificially a bug on the bts
This would not be artificial, this would be good practice (assuming
the info is not embargoed by the security team).
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Jerome,
- I would be much more comfortable if you asked the previous
maintainer for comments on the ITP (even if he never answers!)
- You could comment on #691988 explaining why you think the package
should be accepted for Wheezy:
Hi Norbert,
Thank you for your interest and comments. I've re-uploaded to mentors
a package which i think it solves both problems. The package was
correctly created on my running system and also on a pbuilder chroot.
Maybe you could take a look at it.
Best wishes,
Pedro m42 Ribeiro
On 3
Hi Pedro,
On Mo, 05 Nov 2012, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
Maybe you could take a look at it.
Still not optimal. Is it on purpose that you do build without
translation memory?
From my build process:
...
checking for Berkeley DB = 4.7 (C++)... not found
configure: WARNING: cannot find Berkeley DB =
Hi,
I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway?
And yes, I will ask my sponsee to teach upstream to find more easy
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway?
No,
Hi,
Sorry, my bad on the tm compilation. Re-uploaded with corrected dependencies...
Took the chance to also include dpkg-buildflags to avoid a few lintian
warnings
On 5 November 2012 11:52, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Mo, 05 Nov 2012, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
On 20:33 Sun 04 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-30, 20:32:
.hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be
removed from the repository, too.
Done and changes back in the git.
I don't see any relevant changes in the repository…
Hi,
I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
problem.
During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Policy
Hi,
The situation:
I have build a source package and send a RFS (#675532), and now it is
available here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop.
Since this package is not yet sponsored, I have set up a Debian-like
repository with 'reprepro', and so source and binary packages are now
available
Hi,
On 05.11.2012 17:43, bilibop project wrote:
The questions:
what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages by
using 'reportbug' ?
Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in debian/bug-control
to avoid conflicts with Debian BTS ?
If you want people to use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 692366 RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA]
Bug #692366 [sponsorship-requests] Fwd: RFS: [RC][ITA] kbibtex/0.4-3
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: kbibtex/0.4-3 [RC][ITA]' from 'Fwd: RFS: [RC][ITA]
kbibtex/0.4-3'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 05/11/2012 17:43, bilibop project a écrit :
The .dsc and .tar.gz files in the personal repository are exactly
the sames than those I have uploaded on mentors.debian.net. If the
answer to the previous question is YES, must I send a different
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:29:24PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed
bilibop project quid...@safe-mail.net writes:
The questions:
what can happen if a user reports a bug against one of my packages by
using 'reportbug' ?
Must I explicitly add 'Send-To: quid...@poivron.org' in debian/bug-control
to avoid conflicts with Debian BTS ?
I use Bugs: mailto:address
Hi Boris,
Il 05/11/2012 16:02, Boris Pek ha scritto:
During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Policy §4.9 for details.
Thank you very
Your message dated Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:41:20 +0900
with message-id 20121105224120.gc12...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at
and subject line Re: Bug#692240: RFS: poedit/1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692240,
regarding RFS: poedit/1.5.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
https://csb.codeplex.com/downloads/get/466454
as direct link and it delivers the tarball in question after some
seconds of delay. The line of html code that contains this link also
contains the version number as link content so
Your message dated Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:20:30 +
with message-id e1tvaem-00027j...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #691780,
regarding RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
19 matches
Mail list logo
