On 26 Nov 2012, at 21:37, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
1.) I didn't notice it first time but the last paragraph of the long
description is a bit like advertising.
I see what you mean. I've removed some of it and reworded the rest. Does that
look OK now?
2.) The upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-5
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.7-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-5' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.7-1'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683473:
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
with message-id e1tf12m-0003dm...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #694872,
regarding RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org
To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
Package lftp has been
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #694872 {Done: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org}
[sponsorship-requests] RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #694872 to the same values
previously set
--
694872:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package toped
Package name: toped
Version : 0.9.8.1-r2211-1
Upstream Author :
Svilen Krustev - s...@toped.org.uk
Sergey Gaitukevich - gaitukev...@toped.org.uk
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2012-12-01, 20:45:
I decided to push my git repository to collab-maint. You can find it
here:
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/yamcha.git
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/yamcha.git
Great. If you don't keep the
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:27:01 +0100
with message-id 20121202152701.gy19...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at
and subject line Re: Bug#694872: RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #694872,
regarding RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 687620 RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP]
Bug #687620 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP]' from 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3
[ITP]'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 671660 RFS: calendar-exchange-provider/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- MS Exchange
support for iceowl-extension
Bug #671660 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: calendar-exchange-provider/2.2.3-1
[ITP] -- MS Exchange support for iceowl-extension
Changed Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-8
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.8-5
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-8' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-5'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683473:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 692561 by 694940
Bug #692561 [wnpp] ITP: toped -- Toped is a cross-platform IC layout editor
692561 was not blocked by any bugs.
692561 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 692561: 694940
stop
Stopping processing here.
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:59:44PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
From: Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org
To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
might be a problem is some script, because mentors has 2 versions of lftp: a
version for sid, and a version for testing-proposed-updates.
However, are you sure
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:23:47PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Thanks for your reply (and thanks gregor for the upload).
lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
might be a problem is some
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package podget.
There has been an older version included in the Debian repositories but
it is a
little out of date. This package is an update that covers all that has
been
fixed in the last 5
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil),
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I
James,
Thanks. I have downloaded and I will look.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bbca13.1070...@periapt.co.uk
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
because
the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
4.3.6-1
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone through tpu recently (e.g. cdbs, underscore,
etc.).
Sure,
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
packages that have gone
I don't intend to sponsor this package but here is a review.
If you are contacting upstream as a result of this review, please
point them at our upstream guide:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
This package is not suitable for Debian main yet, here are the blockers:
tpd_common/glf.* have a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 682893 RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
Bug #682893 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: freefoam/0.1.2-1 (for experimental)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)' from 'RFS:
freefoam/0.1.2-1 (for
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:20:37 +
with message-id e1tfnwh-0002wi...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
has caused the Debian Bug report #682893,
regarding RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:06:55 +
with message-id 20121203050655.ga7...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #694968,
regarding RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.8-8
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-12' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-8'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 06:23:50 +
with message-id e1tfprw-il...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #670176,
regarding RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
unarchive 670176
reopen 670176
Bug #670176 {Done: Bart Martens
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:08:23 +
with message-id 20121203070823.gb7...@master.debian.org
and subject line RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #670176,
regarding RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
30 matches
Mail list logo
