-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/02/13 18:56, Bart Martens wrote:
The redirector githubredir is obsolete, because github allows uscan
now. It's possible that githubredir is still documented in some
versions of man uscan.
You can choose to add a comments-only watch file
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
ok, agree, my typo. But I think it
Le Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:56:11AM +0100, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package compton
* Package name: compton
Version : 0.0.1+git-2182505-2013-02-05-1
Upstream Author : Christopher Jeffrey
Hi,
I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
But until now nobody seemed to be interested in sponsoring them.
I got messages not familiar with these packages or
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:09:04PM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
But until now nobody seemed to be interested in
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:09:04 +0100,
Willem van den Akkerwvdak...@wilsoft.nl wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
But until now nobody seemed to be interested
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rrep
* Package name: rrep
Version : 1.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Arno Onken asn...@asnelt.org
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rrep/
* License :
Hi Jose,
thanks for adopting this package. You have done a good job on packaging
and I have not found there any critical errors there. So I uploaded that.
But there are a couple of fix, which, please, prepare for your next upload:
1) Add CVS for packaging (preferable Alioth-services).
2)
While this isn't true of the general case, which I think there's valid
concern about, it is currently during freeze, most DDs are working on RC
bugs :)
Ok.
Some sponsorship does still go on -- perhaps you could ask some of the
DDs who maintain jabber servers -- the ejabberd folks or so,
Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:25:45 +0100
with message-id 512d2859.8040...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#701668: RFS: medit/1.1.1-1 [ITA] -- Useful programming
and around-programming text editor
has caused the Debian Bug report #701668,
regarding RFS: medit/1.1.1-1 [ITA] -- Useful
If I am reading your (big) changelogs correctly, you are (amongst other
things) switching patch-system to quilt, and package new upstream
versions - This is a big no-no for the release team during the freeze
(see [1]) which we have had since June [2].
This might lower the chances of
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
Be patient and don't give up. I know this can be frustrating and
annoying, and we're slowly trying to improve the
Hi Willem,
thanks for adopting these the package. But there are some
questions/notes regarding it:
1) Remove quilt and hardening-includes from BD, they are useless there.
2) Vcs-Browser: ;a=summary is not needed.
3) Convert copyright file into DEP-5 format.
4) debian/docs is not used? If so -
On 26/02/13 21:51, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
Be patient and don't give up. I know this can be frustrating and
annoying, and
Il 25/02/2013 23:50, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
* Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com, 2013-02-23, 19:37:
I just sent another email further explaining the issue and pointing out it
is a general issue.
Thanks.
I think this change
* Move plugins from /usr/lib/fst/ to /usr/lib/fst/1/.
Your message dated Wed, 27 Feb 2013 04:20:26 +
with message-id e1uayvg-0002an...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: sylkserver/2.1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #690049,
regarding RFS: sylkserver/2.1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Here is a hopefully comprehensive, general answer to this question,
not specific to your situation:
Freeze:
During the release freeze, most Debian folks are focussed on getting
the release out. Fixing RC bugs, fixing important bugs, doing upgrade
testing, writing release notes, finalising the
Bah, I need to read before sending.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
Specialization:
...
Unfortunately can mean
Unfortunately this can mean there are no sponsors for particular areas.
Preferences:
Different folks have different packaging preferences, some like cdbs,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:07:11PM +, Philip Ashmore wrote:
On 26/02/13 21:51, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
Be patient
I'm reminded of the metrics stuff that was discussed ages ago:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsNet#Metrics
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
21 matches
Mail list logo
