Hello there,
I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754
A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h)
which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are
not the same on i386 and
Hi Thomas,
I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754
A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h)
which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are
not the same on i386 and
Ok Ilyas! You need a sponsor to upload the package.
You should wait now.
Best regards,
Eriberto
2013/5/13 Ильяс Гасанов torso.n...@gmail.com:
On Thu, 9 May, 2013 at 18:21:30 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
Hello and thank you.
Done, now lintian displays that the package is clean. However, the
Hi,
On 13 May 2013 11:27, Ильяс Гасанов torso.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Done, now lintian displays that the package is clean. However, the
upstream distribution has no changelog at all so I had to analyze all
the previous versions released and write it myself. Also, it would be
rather good if the
Your message dated Mon, 13 May 2013 16:23:07 +
with message-id e1ubvwl-0002pf...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libgetoptionkit-php/1.2.1-1 [ITP] - CLI option
parser for PHP
has caused the Debian Bug report #697142,
regarding RFS: libgetoptionkit-php/1.2.1-1 [ITP] - CLI
Hi Srećko,
the package looks ok for me. Just a couple of notes:
1) Please, add --parallel to dh to get a faster building.
2) Is it difficult to add some kind of auto-test? Better to add one more
target into makefile (you patch it anyway), so it can be picked up by
dh_autotest.
3) Do you plan to
Thomas Moulard thomas.moul...@gmail.com writes:
A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h) which
differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are
not the same on i386 and powerpc).
So far, the only solution I can think of is moving this header
I get W-dpkg-buildflags-missing|CPPFLAGS 25 (of 25), CFLAGS 25 (of 25),
LDFLAGS 25 (of 25) missing|
when I do blhc --build and I was wondering how to get the CPPFLAG. I
tried overriding auto build and do make CFLAGS+=$(shell dpkg-buildflags
--get CFLAGS) and same with CPPFLAGS but it still
Please show us your debian/rules file and a full build log with
DH_VERBOSE=1 set.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:02:55PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Please upload your package on mentors.debian.net and/or provide a link
to your .dsc, [...]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aafigure/aafigure_0.5-3.1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello,
Thank you very much for the detailed review of the package. I've taken some
time to address your feedback, as well as share some improvements upstream.
You can get the latest version of the package with
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gti/gti_1.1.0-1.dsc
(note the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcidr:
* Package name: libcidr
Version: 1.2
Upstream Author: Mathew Fuller
* URL: http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/projects/libcidr
* License: BSD
Section: contrib/libs
It
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:15:03AM +0700, Daniil Baturin wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
Initial release (Non-maintainer upload). (Closes: #702773)
If you intend to be the maintainer of this package, why are you uploading it as
a NMU? The package appears to list the upstream
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:55:15PM +, Nathan Owens wrote:
when I do blhc --build and I was wondering how to get the CPPFLAG.
I tried overriding auto build and do make CFLAGS+=$(shell
dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) and same with CPPFLAGS but it still
^^
Your message dated Tue, 14 May 2013 04:22:43 +
with message-id e1uc6l9-0006et...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: gcc-4.8-doc/4.8.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #707674,
regarding RFS: gcc-4.8-doc/4.8.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
15 matches
Mail list logo
