Bug#717281: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.5-1

2013-08-22 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-08-18 17:17:22, Andreas Moog wrote: On 18.08.2013 15:51, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: The diff between 0.0.4-2 and 0.0.5-1 contains the following change for debian/changelog: [...] Is this change intentional or a mistake? That's interesting. No, that wasn't intentional. I

Bug#717281: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.5-1

2013-08-22 Thread Andreas Moog
On 22.08.2013 12:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I guess the following change is also due to the missing changes from 0.0.4-2: Yeah :-( Somehow my local git repository must have been tainted. Very sorry about that. The current version on mentors and in the git should be fine. -- Andreas Moog

Bug#717281: marked as done (RFS: pdfcube/0.0.5-1)

2013-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:41:44 +0200 with message-id 20130822164144.ga32...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#717281: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #717281, regarding RFS: pdfcube/0.0.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#719973: RFS: fonts-klaudia-berenika/2011-09-03-1 (ITP #719787)

2013-08-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-klaudia-berenika/fonts-klaudia-berenika_2011-09-03-1.dsc Unfortunately this still contains the sourceless PDFs so I guess the package will be rejected by the FTPmasters. -- bye,

Bug#662955: RFS: rubyripper/0.6.2-1 [ITP]

2013-08-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Scott Leggett wrote: This didn't work for me, Hmm, it still works for me, are you sure? the wiki[0]. Actually, the example has a bug where it looks for two adjacent periods in the file name. I note that you were the last editor of the page - maybe you could