Re: how to allocate a TCP port?

2013-10-21 Thread Roger Light
Hi Paul, You may be interested in the ekeyd package, it already does a lot of what you are proposing. Cheers, Roger On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote: I am currently working on a way that computers with hardware random numbers generators can

Bug#726992: RFS: etherwake/1.09-4 [ITA]

2013-10-21 Thread Pierre Blanc
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package etherwake * Package name: etherwake Version : 1.09-4 Section : net It builds those binary packages: etherwake - tool to send magic Wake-on-LAN packets To access

Bug#726993: RFS: django-celery-transactions/0.1.3-1 [ITP] -- Django transaction support for Celery tasks

2013-10-21 Thread Michael Fladischer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package django-celery-transactions * Package name: django-celery-transactions Version : 0.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Chris Doble

Bug#727002: RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-2

2013-10-21 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for my package spatialite. Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this transition:

Bug#727002: marked as done (RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-2)

2013-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:34:09 +0200 with message-id 52652d51.5040...@xs4all.nl and subject line Upload sponsored has caused the Debian Bug report #727002, regarding RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Re: Uploader wanted: new version of ufiformat

2013-10-21 Thread David Given
On 19/10/13 18:12, David Given wrote: [...] Would it be possible for someone to have a look to make sure I haven't done anything really stupid and, if it looks good, upload it for me? https://mentors.debian.net/package/ufiformat Can anyone assist me with this? I want to get the FTBFS bug

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Pol Hallen, I have found another tool especially for administration of postfix: http://www.linux-magazin.de/Ausgaben/2011/03/Mailserver-Admin/%28offset%29/2 This tool postfixadmin can be installed via Debian: apt-get -u install postfixadmin Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To

Re: Uploader wanted: new version of ufiformat

2013-10-21 Thread David Given
On 21/10/13 15:32, David Given wrote: [...] Can anyone assist me with this? I want to get the FTBFS bug fixed, but can't upload it myself... I've just received notification that it's been uploaded by someone. Thanks! -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ─ http://www.cowlark.com ─ │ │ Home is where,

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Pol Hallen wrote on 2013-10-20 21:01: I'm apology if this isn't correct list but I didn't found any way... Right, it is not the right list! I need build my own webgui to run bash scripts on my server: All what you need ist webmin. It is not inside debian! Look here:

Bug#725772: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP])

2013-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:26:55 + with message-id e1vyijj-0008d0...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #725772, regarding RFS: nfft/3.2.3-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#724881: marked as done (RFS: xloadimage/4.1-22 [ITA] -- assume maintainership for Orphaned xloadimage)

2013-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:26:55 + with message-id e1vyijj-0008ct...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: xloadimage/4.1-22 [ITA] -- assume maintainership for Orphaned xloadimage has caused the Debian Bug report #724881, regarding RFS: xloadimage/4.1-22 [ITA] -- assume

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Pol Hallen
All what you need ist webmin. It is not inside debian! Look here: http://www.webmin.com/download.html There is a module for postfix here: http://download.webmin.com/download/modules/postfix.wbm.gz Hi and thanks for reply, sorry if I persist: that script is only an example... I don't want use

Bug#727025: RFS: hexedit/1.2.12-5 [ITA #726547]

2013-10-21 Thread Eriberto
Hey, The 1.2.13 is available. Please, consider it. Regards, Eriberto 2013/10/21 Pierre Blanc lepe...@gmail.com: Package: sponsorship-requests I am looking for a sponsor for my package hexedit * Package name: hexedit Version : 1.2.12-5 Alternatively, one can download the

Bug#724896: Info received (Bug#724896: RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries for dictd)

2013-10-21 Thread Tim Edwards
Still looking for a sponsor, let me know if interested -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52657b14.3020...@fastmail.com.au

Please help: sra-sdk

2013-10-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, we have some trouble with the latest version of sra-sdk which is maintained here: git://git.debian.org/debian-med/sra-sdk.git - Forwarded message from Charles Plessy charles-listes-med-packag...@plessy.org - Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:48:37 +0900 From: Charles Plessy

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Please help: sra-sdk

2013-10-21 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello Andreas, the attached patch eliminates the downloads and building of libbz2 and libz and uses the system versions. Building the packages now fails for different reasons (on wheezy): debian/rules override_dh_prep make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gerddie/src/sra-sdk' dh_prep -X

Bug#710989: marked as done (RFS: plover/2.2.0-4 ITP)

2013-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:25:55 + with message-id e1vytxx-of...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: plover/2.2.0-4 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #710989, regarding RFS: plover/2.2.0-4 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has