Bug#730623: marked as done (RFS: nauty/2.5r6+ds-1 [ITA] -- library for graph automorphisms)

2013-12-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:27:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: nauty/2.5r6+ds-1 [ITA] -- library for graph automorphisms has caused the Debian Bug report #730623, regarding RFS: nauty/2.5r6+ds-1 [ITA] -- library for graph automorphisms to be marked as done. This

Bug#728510: RFS: secpanel/1:0.6.1-2 (second try)

2013-12-04 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi! Please, Could some DD have a look at my package? Really, thank you very much! Regards Daniel -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 Debian user Software libre

Bug#731341: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1 [ITP]

2013-12-04 Thread Sylvain Pineau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlsxwriter" Package name: xlsxwriter Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : John McNamara URL : https://github.com/jmcnamara/XlsxWriter License : BSD Section

Bug#731337: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.5.1-1

2013-12-04 Thread Sylvain Pineau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlsxwriter" Package name: xlsxwriter Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : John McNamara URL : https://github.com/jmcnamara/XlsxWriter License : BSD Section

Bug#731036: RFS: think-rotate/3.0-1

2013-12-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013, Martin Ueding wrote: > > Mostly because the package would not contain the > > majority of the stand-alone thinkpad-specific tools and utils (such as tpb, > > thinkbat, thinkfan, etc). > > That is the problem, it is just screen rotation and docking. “-scripts” > sounds like som

RFS: dict-freedict-*

2013-12-04 Thread Sebastian Humenda
Hello, after the FreeDict packages got orphaned, I as a member of the FreeDict project decided to step up to package the packages for Debian, otherwise there would be no dictionary databases from FreeDict in the archives. The package seems to be lintian-clean with --pedantic. Currently, there ar

Re: Request For Sponsor: Bug 731282

2013-12-04 Thread ChrisofBristol (gmail)
Andrei I think I'll probably just give up - I feel like I'm banging my head against a brick wall. I don't think I want to spend a week or so studying reams of documentation learning what all this is about - I learned how to make a (compiled) deb package and then how to create a repository and

Re: Request For Sponsor: Bug 731282

2013-12-04 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 04 dec 13, 09:25:25, ChrisofBristol (gmail) wrote: > I'm told that I need to "file a separate RFS bug against the > sponsorship-requests pseudo-package". JFTR, that was me, while triaging bugs filed against unknown packages. > I have spent hours reading the documentation and I thought tha