Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package

2013-12-08 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 2013-10-16 15:08, Thomas Leonard wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves around 100 MB when deploying to a

Bug#714087: ipmiutils/2.9.2-1 review

2013-12-08 Thread Juhani Numminen
Hi, Andy, I’m no DD; I’m not intending to sponsor this ipmiutils, but here’s what I have to say about the package. Since you are upstream I’m pointing you at Upstream Guide[1] which tells that it would be better to leave debian/ directory out of the release tarball. In debian/control, you

Bug#731466: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6

2013-12-08 Thread Werner Detter
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6 Hi everybody, hi Jan, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version just adds a patch which fixes problems with policyd-weight on installations where only IPv6 resolvers (fixed DNS::Net usage).

RFS: 389-ds-base update to 1.3.2.8-1

2013-12-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Hi 389-ds-base has five open CVE's, all fixed by the new upstream release which is staged in git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-fedora-ds/389-ds-base.git not finalized/tagged yet but tested. I'm also a DM so if someone feels like giving me upload permission to that package (or all of

Packaging C-Library

2013-12-08 Thread Werner Detter
Hi everybody, we've developed a lightweight mime library in C which attemps to be a general library for parsing and creating mime email messages and is designed to provide an easy to use and easy to integrate interface for developers. I am also one of the upstream authors want to take care

Re: Packaging C-Library

2013-12-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 décembre 2013 16:34 CET, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de : * The package is a small package. Should it, as it provides a shared lib, be broken up into to seperate packages? Should it be libcmime-dev or just libcmime. Currently it's named just libcmime. Yes, libcmime-dev will

Re: Packaging C-Library

2013-12-08 Thread Werner Detter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 08.12.13 17:22, schrieb Vincent Bernat: ❦ 8 décembre 2013 16:34 CET, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de : * The package is a small package. Should it, as it provides a shared lib, be broken up into to seperate packages? Should it be

Bug#716852: marked as done (RFS: libpam-ssh-agent-auth/0.9.5-2.2 ITP)

2013-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Dec 2013 16:27:42 + with message-id e1vphco-0006rb...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libpam-ssh-agent-auth/0.9.5-2.2 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #716852, regarding RFS: libpam-ssh-agent-auth/0.9.5-2.2 ITP to be marked as done. This means

Re: Packaging C-Library

2013-12-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 décembre 2013 18:08 CET, Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de : * The package is a small package. Should it, as it provides a shared lib, be broken up into to seperate packages? Should it be libcmime-dev or just libcmime. Currently it's named just libcmime. Yes, libcmime-dev will

Re: Packaging C-Library

2013-12-08 Thread Werner Detter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 /usr/lib/libcmime.so.0.1 (symlink to the next one) /usr/lib/libcmime.so.0.1.19 In the -dev package, you have /usr/lib/libcmime.so (symlink to 0.1.19) /usr/include/cmime/*.h /usr/lib/pkgconfig/cmime.pc Ok, that helped a lot :) I'll try to

Multiple Licenses

2013-12-08 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mentors, I've just begun packaging phpipam [1] and I'm now delving into completing the copyright file. The project itself is licensed under GPL-3 which is fine. I have substituted any embedded copies of code which are available in Debian, but am

Re: Multiple Licenses

2013-12-08 Thread Wookey
+++ Daniel Lintott [2013-12-08 22:58 +]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mentors, I've just begun packaging phpipam [1] and I'm now delving into completing the copyright file. The project itself is licensed under GPL-3 which is fine. I have substituted any