Re: (uscan) Files-Excluded mecanism documentation ?

2013-12-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ > > > > with no luck so far. > > I received the answer from DEP5 drivers that this format (version 1.0) > will not be changed. Hi Andreas, The DEP 5 work

Re: (Further) help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gert, On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > > temp_ptr is of type "boost::shared_ptr", but the only > NamedProperty constructor that comes close is the one that accepts > "boost::shared_ptr". > > Since these are different types, the constructor can not be used. I can

(Further) help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:41:23PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:16:54PM -0500, Joseph Gunn wrote: > > Or, possibly, in more than one patch. > > I can confirm that this was a remaining chunk of an old patch that > applied to the new version. The hint was help

Re: Help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:16:54PM -0500, Joseph Gunn wrote: > Or, possibly, in more than one patch. I can confirm that this was a remaining chunk of an old patch that applied to the new version. The hint was helpful and I hope that I get it builded after detecting this potential source of proble

Re: Help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Joseph Gunn
Or, possibly, in more than one patch. Patrick Baggett wrote: >Hi Andreas, > >I'm pretty decent at C++. The lines 120 and 134 contain the same function >prototype, i.e. the return value is the same, the name is the same, and the >parameter count/type/number are the same. The compiler cannot tell

Re: Help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Patrick Baggett
Hi Andreas, I'm pretty decent at C++. The lines 120 and 134 contain the same function prototype, i.e. the return value is the same, the name is the same, and the parameter count/type/number are the same. The compiler cannot tell which version of the function to use. I can't access the git repo via

Bug#717733: marked as done (RFS: feincms-elephantblog/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- simplistic blog engine for FeinCMS)

2013-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:27:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: feincms-elephantblog/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- simplistic blog engine for FeinCMS has caused the Debian Bug report #717733, regarding RFS: feincms-elephantblog/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- simplistic blog engine for Fein

Bug#720333: marked as done (RFS: dualword-index/0.1.0-1 [ITP] [new package])

2013-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:27:19 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: dualword-index/0.1.0-1 [ITP] [new package] has caused the Debian Bug report #720333, regarding RFS: dualword-index/0.1.0-1 [ITP] [new package] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#725121: marked as done (RFS: thuban/1.2.2-4)

2013-12-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:27:21 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: thuban/1.2.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #725121, regarding RFS: thuban/1.2.2-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Help with C++ needed

2013-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I try to build a new version of Ball and adapted old patches to the new version and also created a new patch but the following issue exceeds my poor C++ knowledge: ... In file included from /tmp/buildd/ball-1.4.2/source/DATATYPE/GRAPH/treeWidth.C:1:0: /tmp/buildd/ball-1.4.2/include/BALL/DATA

Re: (uscan) Files-Excluded mecanism documentation ?

2013-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:16:36PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > It looks like uscan is now able to remove some files automatically, as per: > > http://bugs.debian.org/685787 > > However I fail to see where this new mecanism is being documented. I > am starring at: > > http://www.debian

(uscan) Files-Excluded mecanism documentation ?

2013-12-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
It looks like uscan is now able to remove some files automatically, as per: http://bugs.debian.org/685787 However I fail to see where this new mecanism is being documented. I am starring at: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ with no luck so far. Thanks for comme

Re: Debian package from a bzr checkout

2013-12-12 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 12/12/2013 05:01 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to prepare a package from a code source that is > currently only delivered from a bazar repository. What did people use > for package version naming convention ? > > If that matter the code is on Launchpad The ones we us

Debian package from a bzr checkout

2013-12-12 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi, I would like to prepare a package from a code source that is currently only delivered from a bazar repository. What did people use for package version naming convention ? If that matter the code is on Launchpad Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or