Bug#729354: marked as done (RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2013 04:27:58 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE has caused the Debian Bug report #729354, regarding RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuati

Bug#723970: marked as done (RFS: cpl-plugin-fors/4.11.12+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ESO data reduction pipeline FORS)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2013 04:28:01 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: cpl-plugin-fors/4.11.12+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ESO data reduction pipeline FORS has caused the Debian Bug report #723970, regarding RFS: cpl-plugin-fors/4.11.12+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ESO data reduction pipeline F

Bug#733182: RFS: svxlink/13.12-1 ITP -- Voice over IP system for ham radio use

Hi Felix, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "svxlink" > ... > It builds these binary packages: > > qtel - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol > qtel-dbg - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol (debug symbols) > remotetrx - Remote controller for radio transceivers >

Bug#733182: RFS: svxlink/13.12-1 ITP -- Voice over IP system for ham radio use

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "svxlink" Package name: svxlink Version : 13.12-1 Upstream Author : Tobias Blomberg URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/svxlink/ License : GPL-2+,

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 20:39:26 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: > > And IMO all attempts that we've seen so far were of rather poor > > quality. I mean, there _is_ a reason why we have Linux > > distributions and human packagers :) > And there's also a reason why there's a severe shortage of these human

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 26.12.2013 15:36, schrieb gregor herrmann: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:12:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote: >>> Packaging is out of the scope of Debian? That's an unexpected >>> response. :-) >> You

Bug#733173: RFS: gxkb/0.6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gxkb" * Package name: gxkb Version : 0.6-1 Upstream Author : Dmitriy Poltavchenko * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gxkb/ * License : GNU

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

On 2013-12-26 13:44, Markus Hitter wrote: > >>> volunteer driven software development no longer does such things. >> >> Personally I think that is a bad idea and is detrimental to the health >> of the Free Software community. > > The equitation is simple: resources are limited, so a developer can

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:12:56 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Markus Hitter wrote: > > Packaging is out of the scope of Debian? That's an unexpected response. :-) > You asked about automated packaging, which isn't something we do in > Debian right now AFAIK. And IMO all

Bug#732667: RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP]

hi, On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > >> debian/changelog? > > > > > > s/changelog/copyright/ > > > > orz > > > > yes, sorry. > And I just uploaded. > Thanks. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Re: Packaging GNUstep automatically

Am 26.12.2013 05:12, schrieb Paul Wise: > You asked about automated packaging, which isn't something we do in > Debian right now AFAIK. This is something which should change, IMHO :-) >> I feared such an opinion. Packagers apparently think in releases only, > > That certainly isn't true since p