RE: Mentor requested

2014-02-01 Thread Roelof Wobben
Subject: Re: Mentor requested From: p...@debian.org To: rwob...@hotmail.com Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:37:42 +0800 Firstly, please respond on the list in future. On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 09:20 +, Roelof Wobben wrote: I already send a mail to the Gnome team that I want to join it a

Bug#733578: hwinfo/21.0-1 needs updates / FTBFS of libx86emu

2014-02-01 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 29/01/14 02:34, Sebastien Badia wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:46:33AM (+0100), Johann Felix Soden wrote: Hi Sebastien, hi Tomasz, I have not yet completely reviewed hwinfo 21.0-1, but there is at least one thing which needs to be fixed: Hi Johann, Hi Seb, Hi Johann,

Re: Bug#717995: marked as done (RFS: rawdog/2.18-1 [ITA])

2014-02-01 Thread Adam Sampson
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: (closing http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717995 because my rawdog package has been on mentors for 20 weeks) This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. Well, no, it hasn't. I'd still like to adopt

Re: Bug#717995: marked as done (RFS: rawdog/2.18-1 [ITA])

2014-02-01 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 12:10:50PM +, Adam Sampson wrote: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: (closing http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717995 because my rawdog package has been on mentors for 20 weeks) This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#736988: marked as done (RFS: freehep-graphics2d/2.1.1-4)

2014-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:42:45 +0100 with message-id 20140201144245.GA9640@jessie01 and subject line Re: Bug#736988: RFS: freehep-graphics2d/2.1.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #736988, regarding RFS: freehep-graphics2d/2.1.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

RE: Mentor requested

2014-02-01 Thread Roelof Wobben
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 07:35:36 +0800 Subject: Re: Mentor requested From: p...@debian.org To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote: I really want to learn the debian way of packaging. I have read the manual and did the packaging

Re: Moving a package (to non-free)

2014-02-01 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-01-30 09:33, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote: Hi, Hi, CC'ing the FTP masters. I was trying to move a package (iausofa-c) from main to non-free with a new version. In the developers reference [1], the according paragraph is 5.9.1: If you need to change the section for one of your

Bug#737263: marked as done (RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p0)

2014-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2014 16:34:09 + with message-id e1w9dwd-0002ge...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p0 has caused the Debian Bug report #737263, regarding RFS: libcitygml/0.14+svn134-1+3p2p0 to be marked as done. This means that you

new package to the archive

2014-02-01 Thread C@rlos
I have programmed an application in python + qt, I packaged as an application of debian, I would like to upload my application to repositories of debian and ubuntu , is under gpl license and is at this address: https://github.com/onlyOneUci/OnlyOne -- Conserva lo que tienes...Olvida lo que

Re: new package to the archive

2014-02-01 Thread Eriberto
Hi Carlos, A Debian package must be uploaded with the source code. Your package has several problems, as no long description and specific dependencies to Ubuntu. $ dpkg -I /tmp/onlyone-1.0.0_all.deb novo pacote debian, versão 2.0. 323770 bytes de tamanho: arquivo de controle=424 bytes.

Re: new package to the archive

2014-02-01 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
2014-02-01 C@rlos cmfer...@estudiantes.uci.cu: I have programmed an application in python + qt, I packaged as an application of debian, I would like to upload my application to repositories of debian and ubuntu, is under gpl license and is at this address: https://github.com/onlyOneUci/OnlyOne

Re: new package to the archive

2014-02-01 Thread Jordan Metzmeier
2014-02-01 C@rlos cmfer...@estudiantes.uci.cu: thanks for the Recommended, I will work on that, but also need to know, then there are no problems, how can upload the application to repositories? Once the packaging issues are cleaned up, you will need a sponsor to upload it to the archives.

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]

2014-02-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Herlant herla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Vincent, Thanks for this advice. :-) I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and wanted to play with quilt once again!). I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to

Re: Bug#717995: marked as done (RFS: rawdog/2.18-1 [ITA])

2014-02-01 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Adam Sampson a...@offog.org wrote: ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: (closing http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717995 because my rawdog package has been on mentors for 20 weeks) This means that you claim that the problem

Re: Mentor requested

2014-02-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote: I looked today at the pages but I found it confusing. How do I know which packages needs triaging and need for example confirming. For each package on the DDPO page, click on the link in the All Bugs column then click each bug.