Re: Bug#737046: RFS: entr/2.6-1

2014-02-05 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On 01/29/2014 06:32 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release. > * Override build to use shared copy of strlcpy (and friends) using libbsd. > * Fixes build on kFreeBSD. ♩ Ding-a♫ling-aling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.

Bug#737791: RFS: vimhelp-de/7.4.130818-3 [ITA]

2014-02-05 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Hi, I cannot be your sponsor but here are some advices. On [1] you can see lintian warning and errors. You should fix them. For example: Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution means that you need to change your changelog entry so the distribution is unstable not UNRELEASED. Also you shou

Re: Need help signing and uploading

2014-02-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > 1. You have to create a key according to [1] Also be sure to read the OpenPGP best practices: https://we.riseup.net/debian/openpgp-best-practices -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m

Bug#737791: RFS: vimhelp-de/7.4.130818-3 [ITA]

2014-02-05 Thread Julian Goestl
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vimhelp-de" Package name: vimhelp-de Version : 7.4.130818-3 Upstream Author :Florian 'eix' Rehnisch URL :http://www.florianrehnisch.de/vimhelp/ License

Bug#737773: RFS: audiosum/0.3-1

2014-02-05 Thread ROELOF WOBBEN
  Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "audiosum" * Package name : audiosum Version : 0.3-1 Upstream Author : Octavio Alvarez * URL : http://blog.alvarezp.org/ * License : GPL-3 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: a

revieuws

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
Hello, Today I uploaded my first package called audiosum. You can find it here : https://mentors.debian.net/package/audiosum What do you mentors think of this package ? Roelof

RE: cjs build error

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
From: rwob...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: cjs build error Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 19:03:49 + > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:22:51 +0100 > Subject: Re: cjs build error > From: matth...@tenstral.net > To: rwob...@hotmail.com > CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

RE: cjs build error

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:22:51 +0100 > Subject: Re: cjs build error > From: matth...@tenstral.net > To: rwob...@hotmail.com > CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > 2014-02-05 Roelof Wobben : > > > > > > Oke, I put he complete build log on the bug report. > > Can anyone also look at it to see

Re: What to do when autobuilders might run out of memory when building a package

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi, On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:03:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > One solution is to build with no optimisations (-O0 instead of -O2, > > perhaps using noopt); that allows seqan to build on my i386 buildd. I > > didn't try with -O1. > > Any volunteer to test > > $ svn diff > Index: rules > ==

Bug#737751: RFS: read-edid/3.0.1-1 [ITA]

2014-02-05 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "read-edid" * Package name: read-edid Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Kern * URL : http://www.polypux.org/projects/read-edid/ * License : G

Re: cjs build error

2014-02-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-02-05 Roelof Wobben : > > > Oke, I put he complete build log on the bug report. > Can anyone also look at it to see something wierd. > I see no thing that could explain this problem. This test fails: https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs/blob/master/test/js/testLocale.js - I don't know where the is

Re: Cjs failing test

2014-02-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Roelof Wobben wrote: > oke, and how can I override to not using test or not using a particular test. > What the test actually test I do not know. > I made a issue on the githb page of cjs : > https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs/issues/5 In my (currently unique) packa

RE: Cjs failing test

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:09:32 +0100 > Subject: Re: Cjs failing test > From: matth...@tenstral.net > To: rwob...@hotmail.com > CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > > 2014-02-05 Roelof Wobben : >> Hello, >> >> I have a failing test on the package cjs. >> >

Re: Cjs failing test

2014-02-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-02-05 Roelof Wobben : > Hello, > > I have a failing test on the package cjs. > > I have asked upstream how to solve this and thet say use this : > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck > > Is this acceptable for a package which is hopefully once a part of Debian. > > According to upstream the failing tes

Cjs failing test

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
Hello, I have a failing test on the package cjs. I have asked upstream how to solve this and thet say use this : DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck Is this acceptable for a package which is hopefully once a part of Debian. According to upstream the failing test is Always failing but solving it or del

Re: Wanted: Watch file with version encoded in download dir

2014-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi gregor, On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 03:34:50PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > >http://spades.bioinf.spbau.ru/release3.0.0/ > > where the version is encoded in the download dir and the download file > > or do I have no better option than writing upstream a kind mail (which I > > would do anyway

Re: Wanted: Watch file with version encoded in download dir

2014-02-05 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear Andreas, You should have a look to : https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch/ It's quite well explained. Best regards, Joseph On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:34 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:21:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> does anybody have an idea how to write a workin

Re: Need help signing and uploading

2014-02-05 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Hi, 1. You have to create a key according to [1] 2. You need to create your package, place your email and name in changelog. 3. Run debuild and debuild will sign your package, taking the key for the email you have in your changelog. 4. As for mentors, here you have the instructions [2], section 4.

Re: Wanted: Watch file with version encoded in download dir

2014-02-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:21:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > does anybody have an idea how to write a working watch file for >http://spades.bioinf.spbau.ru/release3.0.0/ > where the version is encoded in the download dir and the download file > or do I have no better option than writing upstream

Wanted: Watch file with version encoded in download dir

2014-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, does anybody have an idea how to write a working watch file for http://spades.bioinf.spbau.ru/release3.0.0/ where the version is encoded in the download dir and the download file or do I have no better option than writing upstream a kind mail (which I would do anyway but it would be nice

Need help signing and uploading

2014-02-05 Thread Julian Göstl
Hi, can anybody explain step-by-step how correctly sign and upload a package to mentors.debian.net? Greetings Julian Goestl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

RE: cjs build error

2014-02-05 Thread Roelof Wobben
> From: rwob...@hotmail.com > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Subject: RE: cjs build error > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:41:05 + > > > > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:17:30 +0800 > > Subject: Re: cjs build error > > From: p...@debian.org > > CC: debian-

Bug#737682: marked as done (RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP])

2014-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:00:34 +0100 with message-id <2014-02-05t14-00...@devnull.michael-prokop.at> and subject line Re: Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #737682, regarding RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Re: What to do when autobuilders might run out of memory when building a package

2014-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=seqan > > > > it seems that only the "more powerful" architectures are able to build > > this package but also kfreebsd-amd64 fails (with a different error but I > > suspect the

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 5 February 2014 13:12, Michael Prokop wrote: > > You're missing a dependency on python-rpm. > fixed. Thanks, regards. -- Arturo Borrero González -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Michael Prokop
* Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [Wed Feb 05, 2014 at 01:01:10PM +0100]: > On 5 February 2014 11:18, Michael Prokop wrote: > > Package doesn't build inside a clean cowbuilder environment: > Just uploaded to mentors a new version with fixes the build inside a > clean cowbuilder environment [0]. > I add

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 5 February 2014 11:18, Michael Prokop wrote: > > Package doesn't build inside a clean cowbuilder environment: > Just uploaded to mentors a new version with fixes the build inside a clean cowbuilder environment [0]. I added several build-depends because they are necessary to pass tests. Also,

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Michael Prokop
* Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [Wed Feb 05, 2014 at 10:56:08AM +0100]: > On 5 February 2014 10:54, Michael Prokop wrote: > > I'm willing to sponsor the upload, please give me a short ping if > > you want me to upload > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rpmlint/rpmlint_1.5-1.dsc > > now (to

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 5 February 2014 10:54, Michael Prokop wrote: > I'm willing to sponsor the upload, please give me a short ping if > you want me to upload > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rpmlint/rpmlint_1.5-1.dsc > now (to not conflict with anyone else). > Go ahead. Thanks. -- Arturo Borrero G

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Michael Prokop
* Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [Wed Feb 05, 2014 at 10:39:43AM +0100]: > Thanks for the review, find a new version in mentors [1] (please wait > a few minutes, I just order the upload). > [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/rpmlint I'm willing to sponsor the upload, please give me a short ping if y

Bug#737682: RFS: rpmlint/1.5-1 [ITP]

2014-02-05 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Hi there! thanks for your time and review. Some comments below. On 5 February 2014 05:19, Paul Wise wrote: > > How you intend to use this package - what is your motivation for > wanting this in Debian? > In Debian we have all the necessary to develop, build and distribute RPM packages. However,

Bug#737710: RFS: linuxlogo/5.11-4 [ITA]

2014-02-05 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "linuxlogo". I have fixed problems with the package that have been shown to me during the last RFS request. * Package name: linuxlogo Version : 5.11-4 Upstream Author