Bug#751550: RFS: aclock.app/0.4.0-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aclock.app. It builds these binary packages: aclock.app - Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)

Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.6-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean (except that I'm using an old

Re: Help with libquazip / Qt4-Qt5

On 2014-06-13, Eric Maeker eric.mae...@gmail.com wrote: Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions. - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4? Both. for now. - for Qt4 projects (as some projects still not ported to Qt5), how can we provide a compatible Qt4

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo * Marcio de Souza Oliveira m.desouz...@gmail.com, 2014-06-13, 17:53: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crunch/crunch_3.6-1.dsc Let me see: Section: misc Perhaps it should be “Section: text”? Crunch is a wordlist generator where you can specify a

Bug#751609: RFS: dmaths/3.5.2.5+dfsg1-1 (new version of a package that is already in Debian)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dmaths. I have already tried to upgrade this package repeatedly[0][1] There is a community of users of this package in Debian[2] and there are users (on Ubuntu) impatiently awaiting the

Bug#736665: marked as done (RFS: fonts-clear-sans/1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:23:43 + with message-id e1ww1yp-0002kj...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: fonts-clear-sans/1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #736665, regarding RFS: fonts-clear-sans/1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#735182: marked as done (RFS: fuseloop/1.0.3-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:23:41 + with message-id e1ww1yn-0002kw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: fuseloop/1.0.3-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE has caused the Debian Bug report #735182, regarding RFS: fuseloop/1.0.3-1 ITP -- loopback mount using FUSE to be

Bug#736655: marked as done (RFS: napi-bash/0.31.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:23:41 + with message-id e1ww1yn-0002ka...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: napi-bash/0.31.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #736655, regarding RFS: napi-bash/0.31.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the