Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-24 Thread 陳昌倬
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm Package name: lilyterm Version : 0.9.9.4-1 Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet) URL : http://lilyterm.luna.com.tw/ License : GPL-3+

Bug#752559: RFS: dblatex/0.3.5-1

2014-06-24 Thread Andreas Hoenen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dblatex * Package name: dblatex Version : 0.3.5-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Guillon mars...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/ * License

Bug#745302: marked as done (RFS: fcitx-skk/0.1.0-1 [ITP])

2014-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:23:36 + with message-id e1wztvq-0004lh...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: fcitx-skk/0.1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #745302, regarding RFS: fcitx-skk/0.1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-24 Thread gustavo panizzo gfa
On 06/24/2014 09:41 AM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm i'm a lilyterm user, i offer my help to co-maintain the package -- 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

Bug#729002: marked as done (RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.4-2 [ITP])

2014-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2014 04:23:52 + with message-id e1wzeks-0002d1...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.4-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #729002, regarding RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.4-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that

I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-24 Thread Paul Elliott
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:04:28PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:45:19AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote: Is there any way the removal of maitreya from testing can be delayed until after the new version of sqlite3 becomes available in unstable? That shouldn't be a concern

Re: I would like to renew my request to delay the removal of maitreya from testing.

2014-06-24 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-06-25 07:40, Paul Elliott wrote: [...] Therefore, I would like to request additional delay to sometime after libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev reaches testing. As matters now stand there is no way I can reach the deadline of -- maitreya 7.0.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on