Bug#752027: marked as done (RFS: ocrodjvu/0.7.18-1 -- (Python-apps) tool to perform OCR on DjVu documents)

2014-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:17:34 -0700 with message-id caczd_tasiqvromkgscc2x6m+ueorpjnjpe8vudko3zhnmh9...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#752027: RFS: ocrodjvu/0.7.18-1 -- (Python-apps) tool to perform OCR on DjVu documents has caused the Debian Bug report #752027, regarding

Bug#751665: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/8.0-2)

2014-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:20 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tCXpaKBQE7imfvgTC8YUAbDsvAoEYkEGkU21Q=x7a3...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#751665: RFS: pentobi/8.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #751665, regarding RFS: pentobi/8.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#751666: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/8.0-2)

2014-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:20 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tCXpaKBQE7imfvgTC8YUAbDsvAoEYkEGkU21Q=x7a3...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#751665: RFS: pentobi/8.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #751665, regarding RFS: pentobi/8.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#747476: marked as done (RFS: mcron/1.0.8-1)

2014-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:06:50 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tA=yhw4hg6ferx_2az78hdlyydvbd+lby+sfhtx33y...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#747476: RFS: mcron/1.0.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #747476, regarding RFS: mcron/1.0.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#747476: RFS: mcron/1.0.7-1

2014-06-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org, 2014-06-26, 01:06: - I'm not sure why you renamed debian/mcron.manpages - debian/mcron.manpage, because the former is preferred according to dh_installman(1), although I guess it checks for either one AFAICT, it checks only for “manpages”. so the manpage

Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]

2014-06-26 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:34:22PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Aye, lilyterm-data is only 76K. Even when multiplied by 12 architectures, that's still less than a megabyte. And now for something completely different: You must not remove the alternative in prerm upgrade. See bug #71621 for

Bug#752782: RFS: kvmcs-server_0.4.0 server part in kvm client server environment

2014-06-26 Thread willem kuyn
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kvmcs-server: * Package name: kvmcs-server Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : willem kuyn; willemk...@gmail.com * URL : * License : GPL-3+ Section

Bug#752782: RFS: kvmcs-server_0.4.0 server part in kvm client server environment

2014-06-26 Thread Daniel Lintott
Hi Willem, NB: I'm not a DD so cannot sponsor your package But a couple of points to consider... On 26/06/14 15:21, willem kuyn wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package kvmcs-server: * Package name: kvmcs-server Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : willem kuyn;

Bug#740120: marked as done (RFS: gambc/4.7.2-1 [ITA])

2014-06-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:24:04 + with message-id e1x0nhk-0007nu...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: gambc/4.7.2-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #740120, regarding RFS: gambc/4.7.2-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem