Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-08-14 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-ufw" * Package name: kcm-ufw Version : 0.4.3-1 * Upstream Author : Craig Drummond URL : http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/UFW+KControl+Module?content=1377

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: > Initial priorities are set by the ftpmaster that accepted the package from > NEW. They may, or may not match the ones in the package's priority field. > > i.e. that field is an _advisory_ field. This is not what is in the policy. The policy says, that it is

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote: > Russ Allbery writes: > > Also, dak is canonical for priorities, and values in binary packages > > are only used on initial upload to set the initial override value. > > From that point forward, changes have to be made via bugs filed with > > ftp.debian.o

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Russ Allbery
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> I'm pretty sure that default is applied before dak ever sees the binary >> package priority. (In other words, it's expanded via the build process >> before priorities are added to the *.changes file.) > So it is a debhe

Bug#758134: Updated information

2014-08-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
* Upstream Author : Qpid Development Team * URL : http://qpid.apache.org * License : Apache 2.0 -- Darryl L. Pierce http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/ Famous last words: "I wonder what happens if we do it this way?" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.d

Bug#758134: RFS: qpid-cpp/0.28-1 [ITA]

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel Lintott
Hi Darryl, On 14/08/14 19:15, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: normal >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qpid-cpp" >> >> * Package name: qpid-cpp >>V

Bug#758134: RFS: qpid-cpp/0.28-1 [ITA]

2014-08-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qpid-cpp" > > * Package name: qpid-cpp >Version : 0.28-1 >Upstream Author : [fill in name an

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Russ Allbery writes: > debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes: >> Ansgar Burchardt writes: > >>> As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I >>> haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for >>> all of them. > >> Policy, 5.6.6: Pri

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Russ Allbery
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes: > Ansgar Burchardt writes: >> As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I >> haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for >> all of them. > Policy, 5.6.6: Priority > | This field represent

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Ansgar Burchardt writes: > As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I > haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for > all of them. Policy, 5.6.6: Priority | This field represents how important it is that the user have the | package insta

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Jakub Wilk writes: > * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 10:08: I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2]. >>>This is bug #6

Bug#739889: marked as done (RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API)

2014-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:31:15 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API has caused the Debian Bug report #739889, regarding RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API to b

Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API

2014-08-14 Thread Josué Ortega
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Josué, > > I have a new, little and last correction. The file README.rst is being > installed in python-twython binary only. There are two ways to fix it: > > 1. Rename d/docs to python-twython.docs and copy python-twython.docs > as python3-tw

Bug#758134: RFS: qpid-cpp/0.28-1 [ITA]

2014-08-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qpid-cpp" * Package name: qpid-cpp Version : 0.28-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * Lic

Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > My ~/.dput.cf file has fqdn = mentors.debian.net as the destination for > > uploads. Perhaps it's misconfigured? The full file is: > > Did you run `dput mentors ...changes`

Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API

2014-08-14 Thread Eriberto
Hi Josué, I have a new, little and last correction. The file README.rst is being installed in python-twython binary only. There are two ways to fix it: 1. Rename d/docs to python-twython.docs and copy python-twython.docs as python3-twython.docs or; 2. Remove d/docs and add a 'dh_installdocs -a R

Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > My ~/.dput.cf file has fqdn = mentors.debian.net as the destination for > uploads. Perhaps it's misconfigured? The full file is: Did you run `dput mentors ...changes` or `dput ...changes`? The latter uploads to ftp-master, the former to m

Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:42:48AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > > In the past two days I've uploaded two packages: > > > > * qpid-dispatch > > * qpid-cpp > > I can't see mention of either of these in the logs. Are you sure you > uploaded

Re: Why is package libcofoja-java not in testing yet?

2014-08-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andreas Tille , 2014-08-14, 10:48: I'm goggling on https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libcofoja-java This script might be a bit confused. so we have *both* 1.1-r150-1 and 1.1-r150-2 in unstable. I have no idea how this can happen. Any clue? libcofoja-java_1.1-r15

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 10:08: I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2]. This is bug #690282. Hmm, so how do I build the

Why is package libcofoja-java not in testing yet?

2014-08-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'm goggling on https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libcofoja-java and have no idea what might be wrong here. A cause for this riddle might be $ LANG=en apt-cache policy libcofoja-java libcofoja-java: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.1-r150-2 Version table:

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ansgar Burchardt , 2014-08-14, 10:26: Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file [3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS lists them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this done, and shouldn't the uploaded/maintainer be inf

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes: > Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file > [3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS lists > them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this done, and > shouldn't the uploade

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Jakub Wilk writes: > * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 09:46: >> I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package >> (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder >> (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2]. > > This is bug #690282

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 09:46: I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2]. This is bug #690282. Also, I am wondering about

Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
> Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 9:20, Paul Wise ha scritto: > > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >> The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again), >> however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a comaintainer, >> saying "feel free to

Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-14 Thread Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr
Hi, I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2]. Is there a special thingy that I missed when I specified the dependency? Also, I am

Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Pabs, > Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 5:39, Paul Wise ha scritto: > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > >>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk" > > binwalk is already in Debian and is maintained by someone else. Please > talk to them about gett

Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again), > however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a comaintainer, > saying "feel free to take it over" > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727553