Hi Daniels,
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 21:07 +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
On 15/09/14 20:49, Daniel Svensson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk
mailto:dan...@serverb.co.uk wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote:
Hi Dariusz,
somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code...
At least for many files there is a Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta,
Inc which is not in d/copyright. So probably this copyright owner is
missing for the * rule. Can you please fix it.
Yes I fixed this.
Hello Stephen,
Hello Bastien,
Am Montag, den 15.09.2014, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Hi Bastien,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:28:54 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, Stephen Kitt sk...@debian.org a écrit :
Upgrading argyll does reveal a
On 16.09.14 01:05:05, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package raceintospace
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package raceintospace
* Package name: raceintospace
Version
Your message dated Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:53:20 -0700
with message-id
caczd_tahzp5enwrafyzw285qqbureywckc-5kxl-qvbdmk9...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#761645: RFS: filezilla/3.9.0.5-1 -- Full-featured
graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
has caused the Debian Bug report #761645,
regarding RFS:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
On 16.09.14 01:05:05, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Dariusz,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski
dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Hi,
the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
fix some onrelated build issue and now the recent build log on
kfreebsd[2] says:
...
cd /«BUILDDIR»/seqan-1.4.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/core/demos
Hi,
On 16/09/14 10:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
fix some onrelated build issue and now the recent build log on
kfreebsd[2] says:
[1]
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:49:08AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 16/09/14 10:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
the package seqan currently in testing previously built on all
architectures except sparc (even on kfreebsd-*)[1]. I needed to
fix some onrelated build issue and now the
Hi Steven,
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:49:08AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=seqansuite=jessie
Huh? According to this it has _never_ built on kfreebsd:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=seqanarch=kfreebsd-amd64
(it is not
Hi wRAR,
You need analyze the package to understand my words. Pierre, the
maintainer, already understood and replied me.
Thanks for your help and attention.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-16 0:11 GMT-03:00 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for your fast reply. I will try help you.
1. d/changelog: please, use 'Initial release' instead of 'source
package automatically created by stdeb 0.6.0+git'.
2. d/control:
- Change the Priority from extra to optional[1].
- The upstream INSTALL file says that you must
Hi Jörg,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
deb...@jff-webhosting.net wrote:
Am Montag, den 15.09.2014, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Ah right, thanks, the last time I checked dpkg-maintscript-helper didn't
handle this case.
Jörg, it's dpkg-maintscript-helper
Thanks for your help. I have updated the package on mentors.
1. Done.
2.
- Done.
- Done.
- Done.
- My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still
fill both fields?
- You
Hi Guys,
On 16/09/14 07:23, Tobias Frost wrote:
There are no indications that the package has been orphaned, so it
likely hasn't.
In case your not aware, it seems the package has now been orphaned[1] as
of today (excellent work by Ricardo Mones).
Regards,
Daniel
[1]
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 09:07 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
Hi Dariusz,
somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code...
At least for many files there is a Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta,
Inc which is not in d/copyright. So probably this copyright owner is
Hello Forum,
I am wondering whether dh_auto_test works properly with Makefile generated via
automake.
For my current packaging, I observe that, during a debuild building,
dh_auto_test only
builds the test program (listed in check_PROGRAMS), but does not launch TESTS;
nevertheless, in hand mode,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Forum,
pedantic This is actually a mailing list :) /pedantic
I am wondering whether dh_auto_test works properly with Makefile generated
via automake.
It should work properly if upstream is doing things the usual way.
For my
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Pierre Rudloff wrote:
- My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
GitHub uses the same URL for browser and git clone, you should I still fill
both fields?
Of course, see
20 matches
Mail list logo
