On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm. I have also posted an
unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two bugs?
Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff
Hi,
I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here
is my dilemma:
- It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the
source tree so as to make it easier for other distros.
- So I did. I did not put my `debian` folder within the source tree on
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:47:08 +0100
with message-id 20141130144708.gy7...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at
and subject line Re: Bug#771361: RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #771361,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
❦ 30 novembre 2014 14:06 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com :
I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here
is my dilemma:
- It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the
source tree so as to make it easier for other distros.
In the
Hello Forum,
On 30/11/14 16:30, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 30 novembre 2014 14:06 GMT, T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com :
I'm currently hosting my self-maintained Debian packages on GitHub. Here
is my dilemma:
- It is commonly recommended not to put the `debian` folder within the
source
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:26:54 +
with message-id e1xv7ko-0003je...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libchemps2/1.4-1 [ITP] -- spin-adapted DMRG for
ab initio quantum chemistry
has caused the Debian Bug report #771372,
regarding RFS: libchemps2/1.4-1 [ITP] --
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:26:54 +
with message-id e1xv7ko-0003ji...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: libvarnam/3.1.4-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #742309,
regarding RFS: libvarnam/3.1.4-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 05:31:00PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 30/11/14 16:30, Vincent Bernat wrote:
In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because we
didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it is
perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format.
Hi Johan,
I checked your package and I am willing to sponsor its upload.
I noticed that you are not accepting parallel building. Is this done on
purpose? Just for testing it, I added --parallel the the first dh
command in debian/rules and build time went from 18 to about 7 minutes
when running
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Giuseppe Sacco eppes...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Johan,
I checked your package and I am willing to sponsor its upload.
I noticed that you are not accepting parallel building. Is this done on
purpose? Just for testing it, I added --parallel the the first dh
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:12:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because
we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it
is perfectly fine if you use a 3.0 format.
Fine in which way ?
It's fine because, for a
tags 769810 pending
thanks
Hi,
I uploaded the NMU made by Jean-Michel with 2-delay days.
Regards,
Eriberto
2014-11-18 20:58 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com:
Today, at 15:24, Alessandro De Zorzi wrote:
Hi All,
at this time I do not have enough time for Phamm's
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:32 AM, T o n g wrote:
Ok, good to know, but that's more targeting towards package building, not
source code developing and maintaining. Does it imply that I should put
the `debian` folder within my source tree now? Because as mentioned
before, the last thing I want to
T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com writes:
Ok, good to know, but that's more targeting towards package building,
not source code developing and maintaining. Does it imply that I should
put the `debian` folder within my source tree now? Because as mentioned
before, the last thing I want to do is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your (iphone/ipad) mobile device
browsing without installing any apps to them?
Sounds too good to be true? Yes, but unless you install to your server
my `dbab`. It will make the magic happen.
Hi Peter,
is there any progress on that? Should I try to rebase my
work on the current git version of arasan? And did you
decide on the format of the git repo (upstream git
inclusion etc)?
Thanks to bringing this forward
Norbert
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi Peter,
On
Dear Tobi,
some remarks:
- Please add a homepage field to d/control and d/copyright pointing to
https://gitorious.org/sleepenh/sleepenh, to be consistent with d/watch.
as your're declaring yourself upstream; I guess thats was your intention
when pointing d/watch to gitorious.
done.
- as
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 04:27:17 +
with message-id e1xvizx-uw...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #770875,
regarding RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:21:14 +0100
with message-id 1417414874.25814.0.ca...@frost.de
and subject line Re: Bug#771288: RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #771288,
regarding RFS: sleepenh/1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
19 matches
Mail list logo
