On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
l...@alaxarxa.net wrote:
Hi,
do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source
package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as
launchpad service for ubuntu?
And, if it doesn't exist,
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez va escriure:
On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
l...@alaxarxa.net wrote:
Hi,
do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source
package and it was built in a clean environtment for a
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place to
build packages for debian.
Dear Leopold,
how about Elida ?
https://packages.debian.org/sid/elida
Cheers,
--
Charles
--
To
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Charles Plessy va escriure:
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit
:
I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place
to
build packages for debian.
Dear Leopold,
how about Elida ?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a public
service for debian that do that, no?
The Debian autobuild service is here:
https://buildd.debian.org/
--
bye,
pabs
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Paul Wise va escriure:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
But I have to install it, and prepare a server to do that. There's no a
public
service for debian that do that, no?
The Debian autobuild service is here:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Paul Wise va escriure:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
The Debian autobuild service is here:
https://buildd.debian.org/
Yes, but _only_ the
Hi,
I had a look into #771753 and noticed that the proper maintscripts that
should deal with the issue are included into the packaging. However, I
can confirm that it only works for package libavifile-0.7c2 but not for
libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev.
I had tried whether the
A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Mattia Rizzolo va escriure:
[...]
The developer run an instance here: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/ (also
with a really nice web interface see github for the source).
(if you are going to ask, the packages are currently keep for 15 days)
Thanks it
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package imageio:
* Package name: imageio
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Almar Klein almar.kl...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/imageio/imageio
* License :
+++ Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda [2014-12-12 08:57 +0100]:
Hi,
do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source
package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as
launchpad service for ubuntu?
Debian is (slowly, as ever, help very welcome)
I have added an entry for imageio in the SoB page [1].
This package is pretty straightforward, pure Python, no specific build
deps,
and lintian clean. I have notified upstream to include the sphinxdoc and
test
suite for the next release.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB#preview
Hello Forum,
thanks a lot for the replies.
On 11/12/14 18:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2014-12-11, 22:17:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
aclocal rewrite the aclocal.m4 files, so precious information can be lost:
a workaround is to rename the
I found two things you need to do to avoid breakages:
1. Strip trailing slash for any argument (especially the first argument,
e.g. the path)
2. Strip full path for old_path, as readlink -f is a beast in case you
have symlink-symlink-dir or something like that
E.g. do:
symlink_to_dir
Debian is (slowly, as ever, help very welcome) working on PPA-equivalents.
It's mostly designed, but is waiting for the tuits to implement it.
doc pointer, DEP ?
do we imagine something more decentrallize where we can imaging thaht an
institutA has an instance of this PPA want to work with
Dear mentors,
I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:
Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your
Andreas Tille:
I had a look into #771753 and noticed that the proper maintscripts that
should deal with the issue are included into the packaging. However, I
can confirm that it only works for package libavifile-0.7c2 but not for
libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev.
(...)
Does
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I found two things you need to do to avoid breakages:
1. Strip trailing slash for any argument (especially the first argument,
e.g. the path)
2. Strip full path for old_path, as readlink -f is a beast in case you
have
Hi Jean-Michel,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:58:17PM +, Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère wrote:
Andreas Tille:
Does anybody have a clue why symlink_to_dir works perfectly for
libavifile-0.7c2 but not for libavifile-0.7-bin and libavifile-0.7-dev?
-bin and -dev are missing the Pre-Depends:
This will never work:
Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over
(1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
as the old version is greater than version specified in *.maintscript.
Please re-do the test in clean (wheezy, jessie) environment
O.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 16:28, Andreas
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:33:11PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
This will never work:
Unpacking libavifile-0.7-bin (1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) over
(1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-16.2) ...
as the old version is greater than version specified in *.maintscript.
Please re-do the test in clean
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pktools
Package name: pktools
Version : 2.6.1-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Pieter Kempeneers kempe...@gmail.com
URL : http://pktools.nongnu.org/
License :
Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will
now use upstream and debian branches instead. Therefore, release
tarballs will not contain this directory.
$ tar tf ../caml-crush_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz|grep debian
Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:29:30 +
with message-id e1xzt5u-0005qc...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #772895,
regarding RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:29:31 +
with message-id e1xzt5v-0005qz...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: django-session-security/2.2.3-1 [ITP] Log a user
out after X minutes
has caused the Debian Bug report #766069,
regarding RFS: django-session-security/2.2.3-1 [ITP]
Dear mentors,
I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:
Ever want to remove Ads and speed up your
Adding a follow-up to the RFS informing about the update in package. The
new URL for .dsc file has changed since the version has been incremented
after adding new patches. Please use this one.
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lightmdeditor/lightmdeditor_1.0-3.dsc
I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it. Here is my sales-pitch again:
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but here
Control: Tags -1 wontfix moreinfo
Hi Bhavyanshu,
A short review:
(sorry, I do not intend to sponsor this package)
- As you seem to be als the upstream author, please read
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide; Especially having a debian
directory in the upstream repository is not a good idea.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de wrote:
posting it every 3 hours will only help you to NOT find a sponsor for your
package.
I understand your concern, but that's not my intention.
If you take a look at
On 13/12/14 05:50, Bhavyanshu Parasher wrote:
Adding a follow-up to the RFS informing about the update in package. The
new URL for .dsc file has changed since the version has been incremented
after adding new patches. Please use this one.
dget -x
Thank you! Riley and Tobias for helping me understand the problems with
the package. While I can fix the other mentioned issues but I can't get
rid of the icons as of now just because they are licensed under
CC-BY-NC-3.0 which makes them unacceptable for debian main (as mentioned
by Tobias).
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jmapviewer
Package name: jmapviewer
Version : 1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Jan Peter Stotz and others
URL : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JMapViewer
+++ Tong Sun [2014-12-12 09:52 -0500]:
Dear mentors,
I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab, the innovative
dnsmasq-based ad-blocker that will benefit most people. I'll keep
reposting this request regularly in hoping someone will pay attention
to it.
OK. This sounded interesting
+++ Wookey [2014-12-12 21:49 +]:
+++ Tong Sun [2014-12-12 09:52 -0500]:
Dear mentors,
I'd like to bring your attention again to dbab,
Other than that it looks simple enough
Oh, and a man page would be nice.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 04:28:03 +
with message-id e1xzejh-0004vh...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772970,
regarding RFS: pktools/2.6.1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2014 04:28:00 +
with message-id e1xzeje-0004vt...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772999,
regarding RFS: jmapviewer/1.04+dfsg-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
37 matches
Mail list logo
