Bug#783308: RFS: mediagoblin/0.7.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP]

2015-04-25 Thread Simon Fondrie-Teitler
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediagoblin * Package name: mediagoblin Version : 0.7.1+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Various persons, GNU * URL : http://mediagoblin.org/ * License :

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/04/15 15:49, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I am getting lost here: do you meant reply with a short update ? or something else ? Exactly that. It rocked ! Thanks, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#782738: Update of the package

2015-04-25 Thread Gunter Königsmann
I just have updated the package wxMaxima as the last upstream release has been updated (without a change in the version number). The old changelog of the release read: * wxWidgets 3.0 is now a mandatory requirement * Various bugfixes * Loads of stability and performance fixes * Adjustable

Help with Java package needed

2015-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I intent to package mauve[1] and prepared the package in Git[2]. I was able to get rid of several JARs upstream included but it seems now it starts to become tricky enough that I need some help. The Mauve download contains ext/zeus-jscl.jar. The source of this is available here[3] and I

Bug#769375: svg to png conversion

2015-04-25 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Hi Bhavyanshu, about the SVG to png generation during build time. Maybe you can use what I have done in a different package (sudoku). http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/sudoku.git/tree/debian/rules It uses rsvg-convert to create a .png out of a .svg. You then need the following

build dependency range

2015-04-25 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, I have a package (cpl) that in the past did build-depend from libcfitsio3-dev, but now depends on libcfitsio-dev. I want to keep the dependency from libcfitsio3-dev for easier backports. The minimal version needed by cpl is 3.310. The transition between libcfitsio-dev and libcfitsio3-dev

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 02:59:59PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: It is copyright issue, so I do not feel very comfortable to just modify the debian package Why? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I am getting lost here: do you meant reply with a short update ? or something else ? Exactly that. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/04/15 15:09, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: It is copyright issue, so I do not feel very comfortable to just modify the debian package: it is why I am waiting for the upstream release to close definitively the RC bug. Meanwhile I would like

Re: build dependency range

2015-04-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The valid way to specify libcfitsio-dev (= 3.310) or libcfitsio3-dev (= 3.310, 3.370) would be to use A|(BC) = (A|B)(A|C): libcfitsio-dev (= 3.310) | libcfitsio3-dev (= 3.310), libcfitsio-dev (= 3.310) | libcfitsio3-dev ( 3.370) but you probably don't actually need that: as libcfitsio3-dev

RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, one of the package that I maintained, apophenia not to mention it, is subject to an RC bugreport, as such to AUTORM (in a couple of days): the issue is fixed in the upstream git repository, so it will be fixed in the next upstream release which may happen after the scheduled removal

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: It is copyright issue, so I do not feel very comfortable to just modify the debian package: it is why I am waiting for the upstream release to close definitively the RC bug. Meanwhile I would like to stop the AUTORM machinery: may I

Re: RC bug fixed in SVN but not yet released

2015-04-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/04/15 15:06, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 02:59:59PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: It is copyright issue, so I do not feel very comfortable to just modify the debian package Why? Because it would mean that Debian maintainers could modify upstream copyrights

Bug#783302: RFS: entityx/1.1.2-1 [ITP] -- fast, type-safe C++ Entity Component System

2015-04-25 Thread Jason Pleau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for reviews (and possibly a sponsor) for my package entityx: * Package name: entityx Version : 1.1.2-1 Upstream Author : Alec Thomas a...@swapoff.org * URL :