Bug#783529: RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA]

2015-05-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Rodolphe, On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Thx for your review! > >> debian/copyright is missing a few entries: >> - src/serial/*: Copyright 1997-2001 John E. Stone (j.st...@acm.org), >> 3-clause BSD (+ upstream author) > > Should be fixed. You

Bug#783529: RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA]

2015-05-16 Thread Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER
Hi Vincent, Thx for your review! > debian/copyright is missing a few entries: > - src/serial/*: Copyright 1997-2001 John E. Stone (j.st...@acm.org), > 3-clause BSD (+ upstream author) Should be fixed. > debian/stamp-patched is useless and can be removed. Done. > debian/patches/run.patch is ra

Bug#777586: RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP]

2015-05-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:06:49PM +0800, Xinchao He wrote: > It builds those binary packages: > > crosswalk - HTML5 web runtime That's probably too short/vague. > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/cr

Bug#776539: RFS: scythe/0.994-1 [ITP] -- Bayesian adaptor trimmer for sequencing reads

2015-05-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Your changelog entry has UNRELEASED as a distribution, you shoudl change that before publishing if you ask for sponsorship and not just a review (though it's not a problem for a sponsor to edit that before uploading). You should have a section for debian/* in d/copyright. You don't need to use DP

Bug#776232: RFS: xcffib/0.1.10-2

2015-05-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Having Description: in the source package stanza in d/control is incorrect, and dpkg-source warns about it. You don't need to prepend debian/tmp to paths in *.install. Though with pybuild you usually don't need *.install at all. The package FTBFS in sbuild: dh build --with python2,python3 --buil

Bug#776285: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.3.0~alpha4 -- non-uniform Fourier transform)

2015-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2015 19:50:58 +0500 with message-id <20150516145058.gb1...@belkar.wrar.name> and subject line Closing has caused the Debian Bug report #776285, regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.0~alpha4 -- non-uniform Fourier transform to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: package name conflict between RFP and ITP

2015-05-16 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! lumin writes: > A package-name-conflicting RFP [4] was found. > > Description : Free software alternative for xv image viewer > > I have no idea about how to handle this name conflict. > Any advice or guide? As this is a 3 years old *Request* without any action since th

package name conflict between RFP and ITP

2015-05-16 Thread lumin
Hi mentors, Initially I intend to package cv ITP : [1] * Description : cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer Then I checked the packages.d.o avoiding package name conflict [2], there is indeed no package named "cv" for any suites. However immediate after I filed the RFS againt my ITP

Bug#780793: RFS: hovercraft/2.0~b1+dfsg-1 [ITP] --- impress.js presentations by reStructuredText

2015-05-16 Thread Daniel Stender
I've injected Hovercraft to the group's SVN repo [1] now. It'll take part in the upcoming svn-git migration procedure then and will find itself in the proper git repo automatically. DS [1] svn+ssh://lo...@svn.debian.org/svn/python-apps/packages/hovercraft -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?l

Bug#783529: RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA]

2015-05-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi Rodolphe, On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacenavd" > > * Package name: spacenavd >Ve

Bug#779589: marked as done (RFS: mercurial-keyring/0.6.7-1)

2015-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2015 01:33:54 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#779589: RFS: mercurial-keyring/0.6.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779589, regarding RFS: mercurial-keyring/0.6.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#784732: RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP]

2015-05-16 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi Arturo, On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liquidprompt" > > * Package name: liquidprompt > * Ve

Bug#783308: RFS: mediagoblin/0.7.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP]

2015-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Simon Fondrie-Teitler wrote: > I looked into packaging them separately, but couldn't find good > documentation on how to package css or javascript files. A few Debian > developers I talked recommended not packaging them on their own. For JavaScript, check out the

Re: Closing superseeded RFP

2015-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Scrolling RFP requests, I found #461915, lockrun, > which is superseeded by `cronutils`. > > Can I somehow make this fact availiable, for #461915 not > clutter list? Should I? I'd suggest closing the bug with an explanation: https://www.d