On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
libming1 - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files
I wonder if we should deprecate Flash related things in favour of HTML5?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello Vincent,
I have uploaded a new manually packed tarball of the Bzr trunk, with
version 1.0.3+bzr152-1 instead of the +14.04.20140109 Ubuntu had in its
repository. I didn't make that clear, but a bad version number could
accidentally replace the package they have AFAIK.
As for the
Hi Gabriele,
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ming
* Package name: ming
Version : 1:0.4.7-1
Upstream Author : The
Hi Rodolphe,
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER
rodol...@damsy.net wrote:
Vincent,
Le 17/05/2015 01:39, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
Hi Rodolphe,
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER
rodol...@damsy.net wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Thx for your review!
Hi James,
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:13 PM, James Lu glol...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Vincent,
I have uploaded a new manually packed tarball of the Bzr trunk, with version
1.0.3+bzr152-1 instead of the +14.04.20140109 Ubuntu had in its repository.
I didn't make that clear, but a bad version
Hi Dmitry,
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote:
and the
package has been orphaned for almost 2 years now. Two of their packages
appear to have new maintainers already
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=karolina%40resenje.org
(curtain and
Hi Vincent,
On Sun, 17 May 2015 21:36:22 Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd argue that the right approach is still to contact the MIA team and
ask them to investigate and reach out to the supposedly missing
maintainer. The thing is, either way (MIA team involved, or not) you'd
usually want to wait an
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-5-doc, which is a
different source package from src:gcc due to GFDL.
* Package name: gcc-5-doc
Version : 5.1.0-1
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
- java_ext/* doesn't seem to be licensed under LGPL-2.1+ as claimed by
d/copyright, but under this license instead:
This software is copyright 2001 E-Publishing Group Inc. Permission is granted
to use the code and/or make changes to the
Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2015 04:27:36 +
with message-id e1yuceo-00085w...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: histring/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - general purpose
highlighting tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #773611,
regarding RFS: histring/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - general purpose
Hi James,
I'm unable to review your packaging at this time.
On Sun, 17 May 2015 17:13:34 James Lu wrote:
As for the package truly being orphaned, I assume that the people who
filed the report already knew what was going on.
No he did not know. #717044 was filed by person who is not a Debian
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ming
* Package name: ming
Version : 1:0.4.7-1
Upstream Author : The Ming Development Team
* URL : http://www.libming.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Vincent,
Le 17/05/2015 01:39, Vincent Cheng a écrit :
Hi Rodolphe,
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER
rodol...@damsy.net wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Thx for your review!
debian/copyright is missing a few entries:
- src/serial/*: Copyright 1997-2001 John E. Stone
13 matches
Mail list logo
