Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:31:18AM +0200, David Douard wrote: Hi Andrey, so what's your opinion? Do you want me to make a 0.12.0+dfsg-1 package or is the already uploaded one is eventually enough? I would change the version for my own package. I'm not sure the dfsg flag really makes sense

Strange *.so names in pbuild do require tricks for test suite (Was: Trying to run build time tests using nosetest for python-pysam)

2015-07-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bas, On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:06:22AM +0200, sebastic wrote: On 2015-07-20 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: unfortunately I did not got any response from Debian Python team and I'm simply lost how to run the tests. Maybe change the dh_auto_test override to something like:

Bug#782847: RFS: endless-sky/0.8.0-1 [ITP]

2015-07-21 Thread Michael Zahniser
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package endless-sky. Endless Sky is a 2D space trading and combat game similar to the classic Escape Velocity series. The game has gone through three months of beta testing since my last

Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)

2015-07-21 Thread Faré
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.4-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-21 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On 2015-07-21 19:02, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting gustavo panizzo (gfa) (2015-07-21 08:05:47) On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote: crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for a way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or

Re: RFS: Please upload cl-asdf package

2015-07-21 Thread Faré
Dear Common-Lisp-inclined Debian mentors, I have uploaded to mentors a debian package for cl-asdf 3.1.5. I'm hoping that in the future, someone else could take over the debian packaging for asdf, but we'll see. (Kambiz, are you still interested?) It has many bug fixes, most importantly with

Bug#792701: RFS: saga/2.2.0+dfsg-1

2015-07-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote: Unfortunately I cannot build the package because the pristine-tar branch hasn't been updated for saga_2.2.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz. Maybe you forgot to push the branch? I've imported it manually and pushed. No idea why

Bug#793145: RFS: python-dtcwt/0.10.1-1 [ITP]

2015-07-21 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-dtcwt * Package name: python-dtcwt Version : 0.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Rich Wareham rich.git...@richwareham.com * URL : https://github.com/rjw57/dtcwt *

Bug#793156: RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10

2015-07-21 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dvbcut * Package name: dvbcut Version : 0.5.4+svn178-10 Upstream Author : Sven Over * URL : http://dvbcut.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+

Bug#793156: marked as done (RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10)

2015-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:55:40 +0200 with message-id 20150721215540.gd19...@ramacher.at and subject line Re: Bug#793156: RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #793156, regarding RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#792701: marked as done (RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1~bpo8+1)

2015-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:10:20 +0200 with message-id 55aec34c.8020...@xs4all.nl and subject line Re: Bug#792701: RFS: saga/2.2.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #792701, regarding RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1~bpo8+1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#793156: RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10

2015-07-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-07-21 21:51:52, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dvbcut * Package name: dvbcut Version : 0.5.4+svn178-10 Upstream Author : Sven Over

Bug#793156: RFS: dvbcut/0.5.4+svn178-10

2015-07-21 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Hello Sebastian, thank you very much for your help. Please revert that. The point of the libav-ffmpeg transition is that ffmpeg provides libavcodev-dev, libavformat-dev, etc. I am sorry. I tried to build it with the stretch ffmpeg packages which did not provide these packages and therefore

Bug#793162: RFS: flask-flatpages/0.6-1 [ITP]

2015-07-21 Thread Orestis Ioannou
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package flask-flatpages * Package name: flask-flatpages Version : 0.6-1 Upstream Author : Simon Sapin * URL : http://pythonhosted.org/Flask-FlatPages/ * License

Bug#793145: Lintian claims license problem

2015-07-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, E: python-dtcwt source: license-problem-non-free-img-lenna matlab/lena.mat N: N:The given source file is cropped from playboy centerfold. N: N:This image is a picture of Lena Söderberg, shot by photographer Dwight N:Hooker, cropped from the centerfold of the November 1972

Bug#793171: RFS: git-lfs/0.5.2-1 [ITP]

2015-07-21 Thread Stephen Gelman
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package git-lfs Package name: git-lfs Version : 0.5.2-1 Upstream Author : Github

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-21 Thread gustavo panizzo (gfa)
On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote: crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for a way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64. But crossbuilding from linux (which I'll just assume Daniel runs on their host) to

Bug#793078: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1)

2015-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:39:14 + with message-id a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b2179...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr and subject line RE:Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #793078, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1 to be marked as done. This

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-21 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting gustavo panizzo (gfa) (2015-07-21 08:05:47) On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote: crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking for a way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64. But crossbuilding from linux

Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1

2015-07-21 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
done De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 21 juillet 2015 08:54 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the

Bug#793078: RFS: arrayfire/3.0.2-1

2015-07-21 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following source package: * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.0.2-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License :