Re: +dfsg extension with Files-Excluded: in d/copyright

Hi Jakub, On 2015-09-01 12:22, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ole Streicher , 2015-09-01, 11:51: >> when using the Files-Excluded: tag in debian/copyright, in the past >> there was an "+dfsg" suffix added to the version number automatically. >> This seems to have changed; is there a reason for that? Is the

Bug#797794: R: Bug#797794: gnss-sdr

Hi, On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:30:01PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote stuff. Ok, so currently Debian unstable is going through a transition to update to GCC 5. This has broken a lot of C++ things, so I'm currently working on fixing all the broken C++ things (basically everything although a lo

Bug#797794: R: Bug#797794: gnss-sdr

no need to be sorry, thanks for caring about the package and the group! :) (and plese remember to subscribe debian-mentors if you arent already) thanks for your work! G. -- Il mer 2 set 2015 18:16 CEST, Iain R. Learmonth ha scritto: >Control: owner -1 ! > >Hi, >

Bug#797794: gnss-sdr

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, Sorry, didn't see the RFS bug. Yes, once you've made those changes and uploaded a new version I will sponsor the package. Thanks, Iain. -- e: i...@fsfe.orgw: iain.learmonth.me x: i...@jabber.fsfe.org t: EPVPN 2105 c: 2M0STB g: IO87we p:

Bug#797794: RFS: gnss-sdr/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

Hi Iain, I see you commented on mentors " debian/control: Vcs-Browser field should point to http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-hamradio/gnss-sdr.git (note the "c" in front of the git/ so it points to the browser not the repo) debian/changelog: please run "dch -r" to update the changelog distri

Bug#797794: RFS: gnss-sdr/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnss-sdr" * Package name: gnss-sdr Version : 0.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Carles Fernandez, carles.fernan...@cttc.es * URL : https://github

Bug#797771: marked as done (RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:22:28 + (UTC) with message-id <680653961.520005.1441203748534.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #797771, regarding RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1 to be marked as done. This m

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for your comments. I've made the changes you suggest. I backed out my removal of the window and osx specific code. Fresh packages are available on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tzlocal Cheers, -- Edward.

Re: Help on game packaging for non-free repository

Thank you very much, I will be doing as directed me. Em 02-09-2015 08:11 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna escreveu: > Hi Carlos: > >> http://archive.ubuntugames.org/dists/ubuntugames [1]> > > lets look at them: > fizzball > osmose > rune > runescape > sorrwakfu > > they need an ITP and to be upl

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Edward, The packaging LGTM, however I have some nitpicks for you: 1) d/rules: please do not override dh_install and call dh_auto_install, unless you have a good reason to do that (I guess this is an error, you don't want to call it twice) dh_installdocs: please consider

Bug#797766: RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! Hi David, where is the packaging? Please upload it somewhere with a dsc file. thanks G. Il Mercoledì 2 Settembre 2015 14:03, David TV ha scritto: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor fo

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tzlocal" * Package name: tzlocal Version : 1.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Lennart Regebro * URL : https://github.com/regebro/tzlocal * License : CC0 S

Bug#797766: RFS: pac/4.5.5.5 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pac": Package name: pac Version : 4.5.5.5 Upstream Author : David Torrejon, david...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/perseo22/pacmanager URL : htt

Re: Help on game packaging for non-free repository

Hi Carlos: > >http://archive.ubuntugames.org/dists/ubuntugames> lets look at them: fizzball osmose rune runescape sorrwakfu they need an ITP and to be uploaded on mentors with an RFS bug https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ mentors.debian.net for snes9x seems that somebody is already working o

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Control: owner -1 ! Hi again Sergio, first a question: what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org review based on mentors lintian: 1) please fix the copyright file 2) please fix the watch file (ask upstr

Bug#787396: Review for mupen64plus

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sergio, I reviewed the package, and you have already fixed many of the issues in the mentors comments, I have only one minor nitpick: why is Priority: extra? https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html does the package conflicts with other packages? build is

[Caffe] uploaded to mentors but NOT RFS

Hi all, (CC'ing people interested in package Caffe) It takes so long time for Caffe to be packaged for Debian, now the package is nearly prepared to be uploaded, and there are still some small issues to be addressed. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/caffe.git My local build

Re: Bug#796917: snappy1.0.3-java: dependency on libsnappy1

Hi Andreas, > libsnappy1 is being replaced by libsnappy1v5. > Your arch:all package has >a hardcoded dependency on the former (how does that even work?).> > >Before I simply add a hardcoded libsnappy1v5 I would like to ask for >comments whether there is some better way to solve this. Well, I'

Bug#797707: marked as done (RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:29:14 + (UTC) with message-id <792966543.241129.1441186154441.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#797707: RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #797707, regarding RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1 to be marked

Re: Bug#796917: snappy1.0.3-java: dependency on libsnappy1

Hi, I guess the current dependency was injected due to the fact that the original upstream source contained a copy if libsnappy.so and src/main/java/org/xerial/snappy/LoadSnappy.java says: * This class loads a native library of snappy-java (snappyjava.dll, * libsnappy.so, etc.) according to

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Hi James >This was all done by upstream's packaging, which I used as a base. >Credits to Peter Levi :) I don't see it http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~peterlevi/variety/trunk/view/head:/setup.py am I looking in the correct place? I'm talking about this https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/r

Bug#797634: marked as done (RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:48:26 + (UTC) with message-id <929783230.196198.1441183706743.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#797634: has caused the Debian Bug report #797634, regarding RFS: network-config/0.2-2 [ITA] -- Simple network configuration tool to be mark

Bug#797407: RFS: node-mocha-lcov-reporter/0.0.2-1 -- LCOV reporter for Mocha

Le mardi 01 sept. 2015 à 20:31:19 (-0300), Eriberto Mota a écrit : > Hi guys, > > As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your > package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities > >