Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Another issue you should address: I duplicate-long-description libcunit1-dev libcunit1 libcunit1-ncurses-dev libcunit1-ncurses libcunit1-doc (you might append something like "this is the development package" "this is the common documentation" or so) feel free to steal from python-pyqtgraph or

Bug#796030: tablesnap

Hi Jeremy, did you have time to look at my last review? let me know if you need help cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi, >You are correct, I've put debian/ktap.manpages statically. wonderful >s/dh_installmanpages/dh_installman/ yes, sure maybe something like override_dh_installman: help2man --no-discard-stderr -h-h --version-string $(VERSION) -n "$(DESCRIPTION)" ./ktap > debian/ktap.1

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:30:27AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Another issue you should address: > > > I duplicate-long-description > libcunit1-dev libcunit1 libcunit1-ncurses-dev libcunit1-ncurses libcunit1-doc > > (you might append something like "this is the development package"

Re: [Caffe] uploaded to mentors but NOT RFS

On 9 September 2015 at 04:42, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:36:00PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >> 2. or provide two source packages, of which main would build only >> CPU implementation while in non-free would build both/only GPU >> (depending how

Bug#797766: pac is not really ready yet

Control: noowner -1 Since for now pac has an autogenerated Debian directory I guess it isn't ready for inclusion. Feel free to ping me as soon as you have a debian packaging, and I'll reassing myself back to this task. cheers, G.

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sergio, did you have time to look to my package review? cheers, G.

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

(please also address issues from other emails) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/cunit_2.1-3-dfsg1.dsc quoting changelog: + * Bump to 2.1-3 + * Fix versions I see two patches dropped and the watch file updated (diff between this version and your previous one, not complete

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:26:03AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > (please also address issues from other emails) I look through emails again, and couldn't find any non addressed issues, could please duplicate it? > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/cunit_2.1-3-dfsg1.dsc

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, I'm referring to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792144#54 and (sorry for that I forgot to send the mail) to the need to mark the package as multiarch where needed https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation also, please rebase the changelog into one entry. (I

Bug#788418: nfft

Hi Ghislain, with the gcc-5 transition almost done, how do you feel about looking at the nfft review? cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte ping

Hi Sergio, did you had time to look at the gambatte review? cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>Hm, there is linux-headers package, why build bot can't install it? >vms? don't know, it doesn't install in a clean sid environment. maybe you want to deal with the module with some runtime build, like it is done with virtualbox-dkms package otherwise you need to force the module rebuild

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:48:12AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >You are correct, I've put debian/ktap.manpages statically. > > > wonderful > > >s/dh_installmanpages/dh_installman/ > > > yes, sure > > maybe something like > override_dh_installman: > > help2man

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Fabiano, +++ alien-8.95/alien.spec 2015-09-09 02:28:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Summary: Install Debian, Slackware, and Stampede packages with rpm. Name: alien Packager: Joey Hess -Version: 8.93 +Version: 8.95

Bug#789699: ping :)

ebian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/vulture/trunk/ Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/vulture_0.6-1_amd64-20150909-1033.build fresh Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vulture http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vulture/vulture_0.6-1.dsc Cheers, Daniel -- 4096R/DF

Bug#789699: ping :)

ly needs the main module in both public paths (and even not at the same time). So, here we go with: committed changes: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/vulture/trunk/ Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/vulture_0.6-1_amd64-20150909-1033.build fresh Mentors upload: h

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>You are correct, there is no need in "linux-headers-amd64", however there >is second option just "linux-headers", and I don't understand why it >doesn't work for you. it does work for *me*, it doesn't for buildd system. IIRC they are configured to pick only the first version... >Anyway I

Bug#786795: dhcp-probe review

Hi Laurent, I'm pinging you because I think you missed my review on #786795 Let me know if you intend to address the issue I raised here :) cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:42:29AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >You are correct, there is no need in "linux-headers-amd64", however there > > >is second option just "linux-headers", and I don't understand why it > >doesn't work for you. > > > it does work for *me*, it doesn't for

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

>Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >realized it just now, >by testing is again in a new directory. Is there a way I could do the >QA work without changing >the tarball version? I guess this is because the package is native >Having two separate patches

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:07:18AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > >Hm, there is linux-headers package, why build bot can't install it? > >vms? > > > don't know, it doesn't install in a clean sid environment. I think that this is because of vms. > maybe you want to deal with the

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Hi Giancarlo, This is my first attempt to help on QA and it seems I couldn't have picked up a worse package. I beg your pardon for the newbish mistakes. On 09/09/2015 04:58 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: I don't see the tarball there... maybe you want to ask Joey to upload it? Somehow, dch

Bug#789699: marked as done (RFS: vulture/0.6-1 [ITP] -- Scans for unused ("dead") code in a Pyton program)

Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:20:51 + (UTC) with message-id <1556435340.5300577.1441794051646.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #789699, regarding RFS: vulture/0.6-1 [ITP] -- Scans for unused ("dead") code in a Pyton program to be marked

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:59:26AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I'm referring to: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792144#54 Hm, I thought that I dropped autoconf from B-D, but seems that this was in some separate branch, anyway fixed that now. As for *.css, I

Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mini-httpd" * Package name: mini-httpd Version : 1.21-1 Upstream Author : Jef Poskanzer * URL :

Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 11:23 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > Changes since the last upload: [...] In d/copyright, you have the same clause for "*" and for "match.c" (and others). In d/mini-httpd.default, I would suggest to remove this "start daemon" variable, unless most users won't

Bug#786795: (no subject)

owner 786795 costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it thanks Sorry send noowner incorrect, with retitle sorry sorry. pgpgftAxubjV5.pgp Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP

Re: Reassigning a bug

El Dimecres, 9 de setembre de 2015, a les 23:01:21, Andrey Rahmatullin va escriure: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really > > don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I have a bug in

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Hi! > what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my packages? > 1) please fix the copyright file Fixed > 2) please fix the watch file (ask upstream to tag releases?) Upstream does not answer people for some months... >

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Hi! > what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my packages? > 1) please fix the copyright file Fixed > 2) please fix the watch file (ask upstream to tag releases?) Upstream does not answer people for some months... >

Re: Reassigning a bug

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really > don't > understand what I'm doing wrong. I have a bug in one of my packages (ompl) > that it's not fault of ompl, it's about boost. So, I

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

Em Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:59:55 -0300 J.S.Júnior escreveu: > > > - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) So, I understand now, i don't need this mini-httpd.postinstall because fix in patches remove man1 and htppasswd, because apache-utils have this.

Reassigning a bug

Hi, I fighting against control@bugs and by now it's winning me. :-( I really don't understand what I'm doing wrong. I have a bug in one of my packages (ompl) that it's not fault of ompl, it's about boost. So, I would like to reassign it to boost1.58 or boost-defaults I have try to do a lot

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 15:10 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> > > - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) > So, I understand now, i don't need this mini-httpd.postinstall because fix in > patches remove man1 and htppasswd, because apache-utils have this. >

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

Em Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:21:23 +0200 Vincent Bernat escreveu: > ❦ 9 septembre 2015 11:23 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > > > Changes since the last upload: > [...] > > In d/copyright, you have the same clause for "*" and for "match.c" (and > others). I had left

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

❦ 9 septembre 2015 14:59 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : >> > Changes since the last upload: >> [...] >> >> In d/copyright, you have the same clause for "*" and for "match.c" (and >> others). > > I had left "*", but lintian asked to be explicit to the files. > > W: mini-httpd

Re: Bug#798458: RFS: mini-httpd/1.21-1 [ITA] -- Small HTTP server

Em Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:23:41 +0200 Vincent Bernat escreveu: > ❦ 9 septembre 2015 15:10 -0300, J.S.Júnior  : > > >> > > - Fix error set -e and no install htpasswd (Closes: #520941) > > So, I understand now, i don't need this mini-httpd.postinstall