Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-09-28 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi Alex (and all), About the `hardening-no-fortify-functions' lintian warning, I use the `debian/rule' template generated by dh_make and merges it with the original `debian/rule' file. Now the warning goes away with the new `debian/rule' file, which is in the attachment. Please try to see if it

Bug#800403: RFS: node-util-deprecate/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-util-deprecate" * Package name: node-util-deprecate Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Nathan Rajlich * URL :

python-fabio circular dependency

2015-09-28 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, I would like to solve a circular dependency with the python-fabio package before (N) binaries python-fabio after (N+1) binaries fabio_viewer python-fabio python-fabio-dbg python3-fabio python3-fabio-dbg for this new version, I move the /usr/bin files from python-fabio (N) into

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-09-28 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi, this is a string I used recently for another package help2man -N -n "enhanced HTTPS support for httplib and urllib2 using PyOpenSSL" /usr/bin/ndg_httpclient --version-string=v0.4.0 > ndg_httpclient.1 done. thanks for the hint. I see #CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $COMPFLAGS"

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Grigori Fursin
Dear colleagues, I fixed all the issues with my package, added the latest upstream release, and uploaded the new version to Debian mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ck The only problem is that I have an error message there "Bug #799268 does not belong to this package" Can it

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Grigori Fursin
Hi Gianfranco, But I already retitled it some time ago as you suggested (including the latest upstream version) and it's now: RFS: python-ck/1.6.11-1 [ITP] My submitted package name is also python-ck. However, it still says that "Bug #799268 does not belong to this package" That's why I am

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control retitle is the keyword :) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 28 Settembre 2015 10:15, Grigori Fursin ha scritto: Dear colleagues, I fixed all the issues with my package, added the latest upstream release, and uploaded the new

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
You need to open an ITP bug https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and close *that* bug. the RFS bug is closed by your sponsor when the upload is performed. cheers, G. Il Lunedì 28 Settembre 2015 10:34, Grigori Fursin ha scritto: Hi Gianfranco, But I already

Bug#800319: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1)

2015-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:07:04 + (UTC) with message-id <1165771024.2670139.1443438424974.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#800319: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #800319, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1 to be marked as

Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.0-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks

2015-09-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:13 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > That's also what I understand since you wrote that upfront. Sorry if I > sounded rude :-/ I was merely arguing in case a potential sponsor would > wait for me to fix these before stepping forward ;-) I see, thanks for the

Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.0-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks

2015-09-28 Thread Guilhem Moulin
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 11:37:39 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote: >> not a reason for rejection > > Not being willing to sponsor the package isn't a rejection, just an > indicator that I don't have time for a proper initial review and > ongoing

Re: Suggestion of new program: execute mathematical set operations on lists

2015-09-28 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 25, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Frank Stähr wrote: > I am ,,, going to program a tiny tool: > > “setup" takes as inputs several lists/sets, calculates desired (mathematical) > set operations on them and outputs the final set (or depending on operation > resulting number

Bug#800140: marked as done (RFS: traitlets/4.0.0-1 [ITP] -- Lightweight Traits-like package)

2015-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:36:56 + (UTC) with message-id <1925922752.2558020.1443433016076.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package has caused the Debian Bug report #800140, regarding RFS: traitlets/4.0.0-1

Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.0 - helps determine network masks

2015-09-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > not a reason for rejection Not being willing to sponsor the package isn't a rejection, just an indicator that I don't have time for a proper initial review and ongoing sponsorship. My mail was part quick review for things you might want to

Re: Suggestion of new program: execute mathematical set operations on lists

2015-09-28 Thread Alex Vong
Hi Frank, I think I know a language that will do what you want, it is called LISP! Lisp stands for `list processing language' or `lots of irritating superfluous parentheses' when it doesn't. Lisp allows you to program as if you were writing mathematics, aka functional programming. I learned Lisp

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-09-28 Thread Grigori Fursin
Oh, I see - I was jumping too far ;) ! I actually still don't have an official sponsor, so I removed "closing bug" from the changelog, uploaded a new package (it doesn't have errors anymore), and will now be patiently waiting for a sponsor ... By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck:

Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks

2015-09-28 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: retitle -1 RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 11:37:39 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > Part of the package maintainer's job is to forward patches, bug > reports and feedback upstream, so thanks for doing that :) Moreover upstream has been super