Bug#809407: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hey Ross, On 30/12/15 07:00 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-isstream" Thank you for your work. I have uploaded your package. I have also tagged the repository. You may close the

Re: RFS: sawfish, rep-gtk, librep ITA

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 05:30:50PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > A long time ago I tried to adopt sawfish and is build-depends. cool :) (as in: nice to see something adopting packages) > But my > main sponsor being too busy for helping me. looking up your DDPO page seems like those ITA are

Bug#809407: marked as done (RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:42:21 + (UTC) with message-id <1370733937.7810955.1451493741234.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #809407, regarding RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Bug#809407: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hey, On 30/12/15 11:53 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Alexandre, really a bad timing :) > > > not sure which upload did go on new queue :) Haha! Mine went in. You know what, I should have replied to the list. Next time I'll do that. I hesitated, looks like I should have! --

Bug#809407: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hi Alexandre, really a bad timing :) not sure which upload did go on new queue :) cheers G. Il Mercoledì 30 Dicembre 2015 17:42, Alexandre Viau ha scritto: Hey Ross, On 30/12/15 07:00 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear

RFS: sawfish, rep-gtk, librep ITA

A long time ago I tried to adopt sawfish and is build-depends. But my main sponsor being too busy for helping me. So I am searching for someone that can help sponsor the packages, close the ITA and help me fix the last bits for making the packages fit for Debian. The packages are very old. I

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal A long time ago I tried to adopt sawfish and is build-depends. But my main sponsor being too busy for helping me. So I am searching for someone that can help sponsor the packages, close the ITA and help me fix the last bits for making the packages

Re: RFS: sawfish, rep-gtk, librep ITA

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 05:57:42PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 05:30:50PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > A long time ago I tried to adopt sawfish and is build-depends. > > cool :) (as in: nice to see something adopting packages) > > > But my > > main sponsor being

Bug#809407: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Hi, >Haha! > >Mine went in. > >You know what, I should have replied to the list. Next time I'll do >that. I hesitated, looks like I should have! Actually I hesitated a little bit too to reply to the list :) thanks for caring about the package! cheers, G.

Bug#809449: RFS: gsimplecal/2.0-2 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsimplecal"  Package name    : gsimplecal  Version : 2.0-2  Upstream Author : Dmitry Medvinsky  URL : https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal  

Bug#809401: marked as done (RFS: node-isarray/1.0.0-1)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:15:50 + (UTC) with message-id <1174918293.7512110.1451470550203.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#809401: RFS: node-isarray/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #809401, regarding RFS: node-isarray/1.0.0-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#809401: RFS: node-isarray/1.0.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-isarray" * Package name: node-isarray Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Julian Gruber (http://juliangruber.com) * URL :

Re: Bug#808538: RFS: corebird

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 01:11:52PM +0100, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > When I asked before about this, although this was a while ago, I was told > the buildds would only use one core per build anyway so I didn't think this > would be useful. I guess this has changed now. Let's take a look at

Bug#808538: RFS: corebird

Hi, On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:47:16AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > If the upstream build system supports parallel builds, you are just > wasting buildd time by removing that option, please put it back in. > > The only reason that it isn't the default yet is because not all > upstream build systems

Bug#809407: RFS: node-isstream/0.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-isstream" * Package name: node-isstream Version : 0.1.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Rod Vagg * URL : https://github.com/rvagg/isstream *

Re: Source tarball update/fix

On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > >> On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote: >> > If you want a suffix indicating “later than 0.5.11”, a conventional >> > separator to use is “+”. So, “0.5.11+ds1”. >> >> I was afraid