Bug#809449: RFS: gsimplecal/2.0-2 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, unstable and testing have version 2.1, while you are asking to sponsor version 2.0-2. Please test your fix against the latest unstable version, and upload on mentors if still needed a new package. (please start with a dget -x

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

Thank you for your review. I will be back when I have addressed all or almost all of the issues. Kind regards José M Calhariz On 31 December 2015 12:42:29 GMT+00:00, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >control: tag -1 moreinfo >control: owner -1 ! > >On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:00:11PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > So I am searching for > someone that can help sponsor the packages, close the ITA and help me > fix the last bits for making the packages fit for Debian. > > The packages are very old.

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

Hello, On 2015-12-29 13:45 CET, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > As I said, the followings are not blocker, but unless you have a (good) > reason for not doing them, I'd prefer to see them fixed/changed. > > * please use short format dh done > * add a Vcs-Browser field done > *

Bug#809308: RFS: cl-asdf/3.1.6 [ITA] - Another System Definition Facility

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22:43PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote: > > - $ codespell --quiet-level=3 > > ./debian/changelog:1247: Seperate ==> Separate > > done It's not. > Thanks ok, now it looks way better. just a few more and then we're good :) * Debian has resources, is there a

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

On Friday 01 January 2016 12:02 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > [ please don't do top posting... ] > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: >> I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform >> upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:14:27PM +, José M Calhariz wrote: > Thank you for your review. > I will be back when I have addressed all or almost all of the issues. Sure, take your time. Keep in mind that you are free to not follow some of the points, but you need to convince me that either

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo [ please don't do top posting ] On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:35PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > Fixed all the bugs. Please check the package and suggest any changes. > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/php-mf2 Ok, so, some more things, and then

Bug#809520: RFS: trend/1.2-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend" * Package name: trend Version : 1.2-2 Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia * URL : http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/trend * License

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

[ please don't do top posting... ] On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform > upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some pointers to > initiate a discuss with the upstream? TBH, I don't have

Bug#809520: RFS: trend/1.2-2

On 01/01/16 01:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > though, I'm not satisfied yet: > * the orig.tar.gz you used to build this release is different than the > one in the archive. it's bigger. I haven't checked why, but I just > can't upload it. I suspect because my connection is flaky, and had to

Bug#802298: Update on the bug

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 02:07:44PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > Still waiting for a sponsor. I'll do it, as I'm doing mf2. > Between these are the 2 lintian warnings > showing up for the package. I didn't understand what they mean. Still > trying

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

Thanks Mattia for your suggestions. I will fix the issues that you raised. I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some pointers to initiate a discuss with the upstream? PHP PEAR is the maintainer will that be a

Re: Bug#802298: Update on the bug

Bhuvan Krishna writes: > Between these are the 2 lintian warnings showing up for the package. Note that neither of these tags are warnings: > P: php-htmlawed source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > P: php-htmlawed: no-upstream-changelog The level of these is not

Bug#802298: Update on the bug

Still waiting for a sponsor. Between these are the 2 lintian warnings showing up for the package. I didn't understand what they mean. Still trying to find out the meaning of them and fix them. P: php-htmlawed source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature P: php-htmlawed: no-upstream-changelog

Bug#809520: RFS: trend/1.2-2

On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 01:22:53AM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On 01/01/16 01:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > though, I'm not satisfied yet: > > * the orig.tar.gz you used to build this release is different than the > > one in the archive. it's bigger. I haven't checked why, but I just > >

Bug#809520: RFS: trend/1.2-2

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 05:55:06PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend" sure :) > Changes since the last upload: > > This is a packaging refresh, using the latest dh/standars-versions. so cool this one :) >

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:32:43 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > > I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform > > upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some pointers to > > initiate a discuss with